Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ngc1566 #10

Closed
11 tasks done
ashleythomasbarnes opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed
11 tasks done

ngc1566 #10

ashleythomasbarnes opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@ashleythomasbarnes
Copy link
Owner

ashleythomasbarnes commented Jan 19, 2022

The QA report checklist for this galaxy
Please complete as you progress through the QA
All data for galaxies can be obtained here

Checklist

  • tp - check baseline of single-dish image
  • tp - check for artefacts in single-dish image

  • 7m - check residual map
  • 7m - check baseline of 7m image (i.e. in continuum subtraction okay?)
  • 7m - check for negative bowls in 7m image
  • 7m - check for artefacts in 7m image (linear features in map, large fluxes etc)

  • 7m+tp - check baseline of 7m image (i.e. in continuum subtraction okay?)
  • 7m+tp - check for negative bowls in 7m image
  • 7m+tp - check for artefacts in 7m image (linear features in map, large fluxes etc)
  • 7m+tp - compare to the single dish image (fluxes okay?)

  • Dataset science ready?

Annie: OK for science. Only non/marginal detections. Some negative bias in the baselines of CS, but since there is no strong emission, not clear that it's worth investing time to improve it.


@msannih msannih self-assigned this Jan 27, 2022
@msannih
Copy link
Collaborator

msannih commented Feb 3, 2022

ngc1566 65.0016 -54.9380 1483.27
04:20:00.384 -54:56:16.80 1483


CS Cubes summary

  • SD has restricted velocity range compared to 7m
  • no clear detection in SD

  • CS tp - check baseline of single-dish image
  • [] CS tp - other artifacts in single-dish image
  • CS tp - header information
  • CS tp - total flux (inside mask) = -1.7Jy (-1.5Jy.km/s)
  • CS tp - mean pixel intensity = -1.3e-3 Jy/beam
  • CS tp - peak intensity in cube = 0.2 Jy/beam
  • CS tp - RMS cube = 0.03 Jy/beam

  • CS 7m - residual map
  • CS 7m - check baseline of 7m image
  • CS 7m - negative bowls?
  • CS 7m - other artifacts in 7m image
  • CS 7m - header information
  • [x]CS 7m - total flux = 1.1 Jy
  • CS 7m - total flux pbcorr = 1.8 Jy
  • CS 7m - total flux in residual map = 0.6 Jy
  • CS 7m - peak intensity in cube = 4e-2Jy/beam
  • CS 7m - RMS cube = 9e-3 Jy/beam
  • CS 7m - RMS residuals = 8e-3 Jy/beam

  • CS 7m+tp - residual map
  • CS 7m+tp - check baseline of 7m+tp image
  • CS 7m+tp - negative bowls?
  • CS 7m+tp - other artifacts in 7m image
  • CS 7m+tp - header information
  • CS 7m+tp - total flux pbcorr (inside mask) = -1.4 Jy (-1.5Jy/kms)
  • CS 7m+tp - peak intensity in cube = 0.09Jy/beam
  • CS 7m+tp - RMS noise in cube = 1.5e-2Jy/beam
  • CS 7m+tp - flux agrees with SD? = YES

HCN Cubes summary

  • SD has restricted velocity range compared to 7m
  • noisy detection in SD

  • HCN tp - check baseline of single-dish image
  • [] HCN tp - other artifacts in single-dish image
  • HCN tp -- header information
  • HCN tp -- total flux (inside mask)= 2.1Jy (16.5Jy/km.s)
  • HCN tp -- peak intensity in cube = 0.15 Jy/beam
  • HCN tp -- mean pixel intensity = 2.2e-3Jy/beam
  • HCN tp -- RMS noise = 0.03 Jy/beam

  • HCN 7m - residual map
  • HCN 7m - check baseline of 7m image
  • HCN 7m - negative bowls?
  • HCN 7m - other artifacts in 7m image
  • HCN 7m - header information
  • HCN 7m -- total flux = 0.2 Jy
  • HCN 7m - total flux pbcorr = -0.7 Jy
  • HCN 7m - total flux in residual map = -0.5 Jy
  • HCN 7m -- peak intensity in cube = 4e-2 Jy/beam
  • HCN 7m -- RMS noise = 7e-3Jy/beam
  • HCN 7m - RMS residuals = 7e-3Jy/beam

  • HCN 7m+tp - check baseline of 7m+tp image
  • HCN 7m+tp - negative bowls?
  • HCN 7m+tp - other artifacts in 7m image
  • HCN 7m+tp - header information
  • HCN 7m+tp - total flux pbcorr = 1.6 Jy
  • HCN 7m+tp - peak intensity in cube = 0.09Jy/beam
  • HCN 7m+tp - RMS noise = 1.4e-2Jy/beam
  • HCN 7m+tp - flux agrees with SD? YES

HCO+ Cubes summary

  • SD has restricted velocity range compared to 7m
  • noisy detection in SD

  • HCO+ tp - check baseline of single-dish image
  • HCO+ tp - other artifacts in single-dish image
  • HCO+ tp -- header information
  • HCO+ tp -- total flux (inside mask) = 0.5Jy (16.4Jy/km.s)
  • HCO+ tp -- peak intensity in cube = 0.15 Jy/beam
  • HCO+ tp -- RMS noise = 0.03 Jy/beam
  • HCO+ tp -- mean pixel intensity = 5e-4Jy/beam

  • HCO+ 7m - residual map
  • HCO+ 7m - check baseline of 7m image
  • HCO+ 7m - negative bowls?
  • HCO+ 7m - other artifacts in 7m image
  • HCO+ 7m - header information
  • HCO+ 7m -- total flux = 1.3 Jy
  • HCO+ 7m - total flux pbcorr = 1.8 Jy
  • HCO+ 7m -- total flux in residual = 0.1 Jy
  • HCO+ 7m -- peak intensity in cube = 4e-2 Jy/beam
  • HCO+ 7m -- RMS noise = 8e-3 Jy/beam
  • HCO+ 7m -- RMS residuals = 8e-3 Jy/beam

  • HCO+ 7m+tp - check baseline of 7m+tp image
  • HCO+ 7m+tp - negative bowls?
  • HCO+ 7m+tp - other artifacts in 7m image
  • HCO+ 7m+tp - header information
  • HCO+ 7m+tp - total flux pbcorr = 0.8 Jy
  • HCO+ 7m+tp - peak intensity in cube = 0.09Jy/beam
  • HCO+ 7m+tp - RMS noise = 1.5e-2Jy/beam
  • HCO+ 7m+tp - flux agrees with SD? = YES

@ashleythomasbarnes
Copy link
Owner Author

ashleythomasbarnes commented Feb 9, 2022

HCN

TP: Good - no detection
7m image: Good - weak detection towards centre
7m mask: Good
7m residuals: Good
7m+TP (round): Good - but noise so hard to tell if flux conserved

HCO+

TP: Good - no detection
7m image: Good - noise spike in chan36 (not inc. in mask)
7m mask: Good
7m residuals: Good
7m+TP (round): Good - but noise so hard to tell if flux conserve

CS

TP: Minor - baseline below zero (but within noise)
7m image: Good
7m mask: Good
7m residuals: Good
7m+TP (round): Good - no detection - maybe baseline a little below zero

@ashleythomasbarnes
Copy link
Owner Author

Weak HCN detection in 7m only towards centre
Screenshot 2022-02-09 at 08 22 24

@ashleythomasbarnes
Copy link
Owner Author

Baseline of CS total power below zero (but within noise)?
Screenshot 2022-02-09 at 08 39 19

@ashleythomasbarnes
Copy link
Owner Author

I am happy to set this as a pass for science - only very minor issues - please confirm @msannih

@ashleythomasbarnes
Copy link
Owner Author

Note @msannih comment about velocity range of SD being a little restricted

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants