Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ngc1792 #12

Open
11 tasks done
ashleythomasbarnes opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 4 comments
Open
11 tasks done

ngc1792 #12

ashleythomasbarnes opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@ashleythomasbarnes
Copy link
Owner

ashleythomasbarnes commented Jan 19, 2022

The QA report checklist for this galaxy
Please complete as you progress through the QA
All data for galaxies can be obtained here

Checklist

  • tp - check baseline of single-dish image
  • tp - check for artefacts in single-dish image


  • 7m+tp - check baseline of 7m image (i.e. in continuum subtraction okay?)
  • 7m+tp - check for negative bowls in 7m image #38
  • 7m+tp - check for artefacts in 7m image (linear features in map, large fluxes etc)
  • 7m+tp - compare to the single dish image (fluxes okay?)

  • Dataset science ready?

@IBeslic IBeslic self-assigned this Jan 25, 2022
@IBeslic
Copy link
Collaborator

IBeslic commented Feb 7, 2022

TP: HCN, HCO+ detected in the very centre of this galaxy. No detection of CS line

@IBeslic
Copy link
Collaborator

IBeslic commented Feb 7, 2022

7m data:

  • CS not detected
  • negative bowling in HCN and HCO+
    ngc1792_hcn_7m_image_negbowl
    ngc1792_hcop_7m_image_negbowl

@astrojohannes astrojohannes self-assigned this Feb 8, 2022
@astrojohannes astrojohannes reopened this Feb 8, 2022
@astrojohannes
Copy link
Collaborator

In the 7m-only file "ngc1792_7m_hcn_residual_trimmed.fits" the baseline seems slightly over-subtracted.

@astrojohannes
Copy link
Collaborator

Screenshot from 2022-02-08 11-57-27

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants