Skip to content

Conversation

@gitosaurus
Copy link
Contributor

Follow current tutorial structure, show simple and slightly-less-simple queries, both with .query and with Python expressions.

Closes #672.

@gitosaurus gitosaurus requested a review from olivialynn May 30, 2025 22:39
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@gitosaurus gitosaurus requested a review from nevencaplar May 30, 2025 22:39
@gitosaurus gitosaurus enabled auto-merge (squash) May 30, 2025 22:39
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 30, 2025

Before [7e1ac78] <v0.5.3> After [098ac70] Ratio Benchmark (Parameter)
6.26±0.03s 6.43±0.01s 1.03 benchmarks.time_create_large_catalog
27.4±0.6ms 28.3±0.7ms 1.03 benchmarks.time_polygon_search
13.1±0.2ms 13.1±0.4ms 1 benchmarks.time_box_filter_on_partition
942±7ms 946±4ms 1 benchmarks.time_create_midsize_catalog
83.2±0.8ms 82.7±2ms 0.99 benchmarks.time_kdtree_crossmatch

Click here to view all benchmarks.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.44%. Comparing base (af44d09) to head (0a16cce).
⚠️ Report is 177 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #799   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.44%   97.44%           
=======================================
  Files          54       54           
  Lines        2463     2463           
=======================================
  Hits         2400     2400           
  Misses         63       63           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@olivialynn
Copy link
Member

This looks great! I'll hold off on approving to let Neven green check it

@nevencaplar
Copy link
Member

Just green-lit it so you can merge when you think it is ready.

@gitosaurus gitosaurus merged commit 92ce36c into main Jun 2, 2025
13 checks passed
@gitosaurus gitosaurus deleted the issue/672/row-filtering branch June 2, 2025 22:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Write "1.5 Row filtering (e.g. .query)"

4 participants