Skip to content

Conversation

@dougbrn
Copy link
Contributor

@dougbrn dougbrn commented Jun 27, 2025

No description provided.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Before [84eff81] After [69bfaa6] Ratio Benchmark (Parameter)
80.1±2ms 82.3±2ms 1.03 benchmarks.time_kdtree_crossmatch
24.0±0.3ms 24.1±0.3ms 1.01 benchmarks.time_box_filter_on_partition
38.5±2ms 38.6±0.9ms 1 benchmarks.time_polygon_search
6.25±0.03s 6.19±0.02s 0.99 benchmarks.time_create_large_catalog
935±9ms 920±4ms 0.98 benchmarks.time_create_midsize_catalog

Click here to view all benchmarks.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.19%. Comparing base (84eff81) to head (186009b).
⚠️ Report is 153 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #860   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.19%   95.19%           
=======================================
  Files          54       54           
  Lines        2561     2561           
=======================================
  Hits         2438     2438           
  Misses        123      123           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dougbrn dougbrn requested a review from nevencaplar June 27, 2025 17:41
@dougbrn dougbrn merged commit 814e53e into main Jun 27, 2025
13 checks passed
@dougbrn dougbrn deleted the link_urd branch June 27, 2025 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants