-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.4k
Having both "Exclude VCS Ignored Paths" and "Hide VCS Ignored Paths" settings is confusing #8276
Comments
Another option would be to rename the settings to |
I'm here because I wanted to file a bug that |
The check box would be more clear if it was:
|
@tomByrer In your variant, I would believe that by checking the checkbox it will hide the |
I second this. Having both settings is confusing. Especially as you have to dig a bit to get to the tree-view settings. The fact that I'm still unclear on the difference make me think that this is a UX issue (or I'm an idiot, which is also feasible). p.s. For future sailors: pressing |
Thanks for your contribution! This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Because the Atom team treats their issues as their backlog, stale issues are closed. If you would like this issue to remain open:
Issues that are labeled as triaged will not be automatically marked as stale. |
This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. If you can still reproduce this issue in Safe Mode then please open a new issue and fill out the entire issue template to ensure that we have enough information to address your issue. Thanks! |
The Exclude VCS Ignored Paths setting under Core Settings commonly gets confused with the similar setting under the Tree View package, Hide VCS Ignored Paths. I believe the first is for excluding files from search and the latter is for the tree view itself.
For an idealized UI I'd vote for removing both settings and adding a new one that is a Select box where we can select to exclude (from search and tree view), exclude from search only, and show. It doesn't make sense (to me) to allow not showing in the tree view but showing up in search.
We could also just add some explanation text to both settings if the above is too radical a change.
// ref #8270
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: