Skip to content
Permalink
main
Switch branches/tags
Go to file
 
 
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 2.0">
<title>No|d Crew</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<table border="0">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="100">Who is the Genius? Who is
the Hacker? Who is the Liar?<p align="center"><img
src="bg.gif" width="83" height="82"><br>
<a href="http://www.kevinmitnick.com"><img src="km.gif"
border="0" width="80" height="176"></a><br>
<img src="bc.gif" width="87" height="176"></p>
<p align="center"><strong>Greetz:<br>
</strong>Rhino9<br>
Technotronic<br>
L0pht<br>
Magica de Bin<br>
OptikLenz<br>
e1<br>
Su!d<br>
2600</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Screw You's:</strong><br>
#Hack<br>
IIU<br>
Analyzer<br>
</p>
<p align="center">All non-free thinking Governments suck.</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="490"><p align="left"><font
size="4">... The No|d Crew speaks out again...</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="3"><strong>Quote:</strong><br>
&quot;Seybold Group Highlights Security as a Major Focus
of Windows&nbsp;NT<br>
In the September 1997 issue of Patricia Seybold's Open
Information Systems, Michael A. Goulde applauds Microsoft
for implementing a comprehensive security architecture
for Microsoft® Windows&nbsp;NT® operating system.
&quot;</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="3">Well.. the Patricia
Seybold Group supposedly did some advanced research into
NT 5 and its security architecture. We know NT 5 has a
solid security framework because We deal with NT
everyday. Seybold needs to worry about their Security and
then worry about NT 5. We did not do anything spectacular
to gain access to this server... a sloppy admin let us
in, that's all.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="3">This site was not hacked
to slam on the Seybold Group, their research looks
interesting. This hack was done to heighten security
awareness. We ask the forgiveness of the Seybold Group in
advance. If this had been a true 'intruder' more of your
network would have been compromised. Your Admin needs to
be flogged though ;). </font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"><strong>[This is also
acting as Proof of the Interviews with AntiOnline and
Hacked.net.]</strong></font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="3">As with any No|d hack.. we
will give a political message:</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="3"><em>The Education System
in this country needs to be re-vamped. Educational books
go to the lowest bidder. Demand more of your Country.</em></font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="3"><strong>Before we go:</strong></font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="3"><em>You need to visit the </em></font><a
href="http://207.98.195.250"><font size="3"><em>Rhino9</em></font></a><font
size="3"><em> website and the </em></font><a
href="http://www.technotronic.com"><font size="3"><em>Technotronic</em></font></a><font
size="3"><em> website. Learn about the holes we used to
get in. Standard security training is nothing.</em></font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="3">We would like to say 3
things to the entire computing community.. mainly the
security one.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="3">1) A *well* configured NT
system is more secure than most Unix systems we
encounter. Unix is not religion.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="3">2) Do not slam or hammer
Bill Gates. Gates was a brilliant hacker in his youth.
You are being prejudiced by jealousy. He has money, you
don't. Live with it.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="3">3) Microsoft's business
practices should not be viewed as criminal. They should
be studied. Not since the birth of this nation has such
an aggressive attitude been taken. Live with their
success and stop being a baby.</font></p>
<p align="center"><img src="noid4.gif" width="266"
height="99"></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>