Permalink
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
478 lines (263 sloc)
15.5 KB
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| <HTML> | |
| <HEAD> | |
| <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> | |
| <META NAME="Author" CONTENT="Doctor Nuker"> | |
| <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Mozilla/4.04 [en] (Win95; I) [Netscape]"> | |
| <TITLE>Hail..</TITLE> | |
| </HEAD> | |
| <BODY TEXT="#FFFFFF" BGCOLOR="#000000" LINK="#FF6600" VLINK="#551A8B" ALINK="#FF0000"> | |
| <CENTER> </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER><TABLE BORDER COLS=1 WIDTH="100%" > | |
| <TR> | |
| <TD> | |
| <CENTER>Marine Corps Detachment Lackland Air Force Base, Texas</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Hacked By</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER><FONT SIZE=+3>Doctor Nuker</FONT></CENTER> | |
| </TD> | |
| </TR> | |
| </TABLE></CENTER> | |
| <CENTER> | |
| <H1> | |
| <IMG SRC="phc.JPG" HEIGHT=107 WIDTH=189></H1></CENTER> | |
| <CENTER><TABLE BORDER COLS=1 WIDTH="100%" > | |
| <TR> | |
| <TD> | |
| <CENTER><B><FONT SIZE=+1>Founder Pakistan Hackerz Club</FONT></B></CENTER> | |
| <CENTER><B><FONT COLOR="#FF6600"><A HREF="mailto:doctornuker@puckoff.com">doctornuker@puckoff.com</A></FONT></B></CENTER> | |
| </TD> | |
| </TR> | |
| </TABLE></CENTER> | |
| <CENTER> </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER><TABLE BORDER COLS=1 WIDTH="100%" > | |
| <TR> | |
| <TD> | |
| <CENTER> | |
| <H1> | |
| <FONT SIZE=+1>For UN to stay relevant</FONT></H1></CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Where is the international framework of rights and</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>justice? Is the UN dead, and its charter buried? The</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>people of Kashmir have long been promised the chance</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>to decide their destiny but now the UN is silent and the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>US says that "East Timor is not Kosovo __ nor is</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Kashmir another East Timor.'' This is in explanation of</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>why US interest in the Kashmir crisis is limited to</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>forcing Pakistan into submitting itself to the Indian</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>hegemony and in Timor to "humanitarian concerns and</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>strategically located sea-lanes." </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>The US, however, is mistaken. The reason the world</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>has a problem with East Timor and Kashmir is that</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>they are other Kosovos but in different part of the world.</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Timor did not begin that way, but that is what it has</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>become. Whereas Kashmir has actually begun that</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>way. All the western governments have trouble</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>explaining why they cannot do anything effective about</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>India's conduct in Kashmir. Where are their incautious</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>announcements about the arrival of a new age of</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>"humanitarian wars'' for doing justice? Where are their</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>unguarded forecasts about the significance of NATO's</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>victory over Serbian ethnic cleansing in Kosovo? </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>President Bill Clinton announced that beleaguered</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>minorities everywhere in the world no longer had to fear</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Kosovo-style ethnic cleansing. He said the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>"international community" would protect them. Many</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>argued that a new humanitarian internationalism had</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>been created, which in the future could stop and punish</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>ethnic cleansing, mass deportations, state terrorism</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>and war crimes. The age of sovereign nations would</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>yield to an international sovereignty. Clinton informed</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>"the people of the world'' that a new era had dawned.</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>"Whether you live in Africa, or Central Europe, or any</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>other place, if somebody comes after innocent civilians</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>and tries to kill them en masse because of their race,</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>their ethnic background or their religion, and it's within</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>our power to stop it, we will stop it,'' he said. </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>The Kashmiris are experiencing a new kind of apathy</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>from the so-called international community which</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>forces them to think if they should forget about their</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>rights in the new world order and wait for deliverance</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>from India's fascism till the day when their valley would</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>become as important to Eurocentric NATO as Kosovo.</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>For a fair deal, should they now depend on the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>compulsions of the states of India and Pakistan, and</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>the narrowly defined interests of the powerful</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>international community, rather than an international</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>framework of rights and justice? Given the historical</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>baggage and hostilities, it is useless to expect that</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Pakistan and India would sort it out between</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>themselves. </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>It is extremely surprising that the leading powers are so</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>willingly accepting India's weak position on the issue in</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>terms of international law. The fact is that Kosovo is</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>still recognised as a part of sovereign Yugoslavia</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>whereas Kashmir is a UN-recognised disputed territory</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>awaiting a just and final settlement. By exhorting</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Pakistan and India to treat an unjust and unresolved</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>UN cease-fire line as if it was as inviolable as divine</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>revelation, and approaching the precarious situation in</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Kargil as an isolated instance of such unthinkable</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>violation, the so-called international community and the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>UN have only eroded their credibility. Surely, the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>present-day upholders of human rights and values of</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>justice and democracy should be able to look beyond</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>the line. </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>The champions of human rights, who were propelled</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>into action because of ethnic cleansing of the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Kosovars, have chosen to disregard the even more</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>serious repression in Kashmir. They have chosen to</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>disregard the ever-increasing number of Indian troops</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>that enforce Indian control through terror, torture, rape</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>and murder. The US, its allies and the UN are</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>accomplices in Indian genocide for they are doing little</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>more than parroting the Indian refrain, and disregarding</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>the unpardonable crimes of India against innocent</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>communities in the valley. It was everybody's business</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>when the Serb forces did these things in Kosovo on a</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>much smaller time and human loss scale. The Kashmir</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>issue urgently requires a just settlement that could</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>only be brought about with the involvement of the UN.</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Peace in Kashmir and hence the region could only be</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>achieved if the process starts with putting the people of</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Kashmir before any strategic, commercial or political</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>advantage of the powerful international club or Pakistan</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>or India. At the moment, it seems that the UN has no</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>power of its own. And this fact has had lethal</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>consequences in Kashmir, when combined with the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>UN's promise that its people could become</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>independent if they so chose. The Security Council</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>thus far has declined to support the promise made in</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>its name. </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Nothing short of the credible threat of a Kosovo-like</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>military intervention, combined with international</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>economic and political reprisals against India, seems</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>likely to end the crisis. If we agree with the western</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>propaganda, such as published in the Washington</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Post, that "no solution can be achieved under the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>threat of military action," the question arises that what</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>were then the US and its allies trying to achieve</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>through bombing Yugoslavia for more than two months</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>in a row? </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>The Indian campaign to terrorise supporters of</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>independence and cleanse Kashmir of its Muslim</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>population approaches a successful conclusion. It has</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>to be reversed. The Indian defiance and mockery of the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>UN is intolerable and destabilising. The UN has to act,</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>as it is no more than what its members make of it, but</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>its existence and action are indispensable to a</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>minimally civilised international order. If its members</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>expect any progress toward a new and muscular</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>humanitarianism, they must back the world</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>organisation against those who flagrantly defy it. A line</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>has to be drawn, and in Kashmir, the Indians</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>themselves have drawn it. </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>On the other hand, the western press is encouraging</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>UN's inaction by treating the Kashmir crisis as an</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>unimportant case than others around the world.</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>According to the Washington Post, for example, "if the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>world powers, having staked their prestige on</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>self-determination for East Timor, can so easily allow</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>their will to be flouted, the 'security and strategic</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>consequences' will be immense, and they will resonate</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>far beyond Indonesia," but no such views are</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>expressed about Kashmir where the situation is more</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>volatile than East Timor. The Post instead sides with</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>India and writes that it "is rightly demanding that</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Pakistan help in removing the guerrillas as the first step</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>toward defusing the current crisis" and that "India has</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>so far shown commendable restraint." </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>With more than half a million soldiers in Kashmir, it is</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>wrong to assume that India is exercising restraint.</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>However, the UN and US should accept that Kashmir</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>issue can never be settled in a cul-de-sac. It shall be</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>settled either through force or through international</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>intervention and pressure __ the possibility of the latter</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>is apparently remote, although efforts should continue</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>in this direction. But nothing can be achieved solely</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>through bilateral negotiations, bypassing the people of</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Kashmir and ignoring their wishes and sentiments.</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>India would not be prepared, it seems, for any kind of</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>talks unless it is under real pressure from the people</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>and the freedom fighters. </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>The British daily Financial Times in its issue of May 28,</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>1999 writes under the heading "War in Kashmir": "The</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>nuclear dimension means the outside world has much</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>at stake too. India has always sought to avoid</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>internationalisation of the conflict but the world has a</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>common interest in keeping it in check. This is</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>precisely the kind of problem for what the multilateral</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>approach of a strong UN is needed." And that needs</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>approval from Washington, which may not come until</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>we face a nuclear holocaust on the sub-continent. </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>The Independent in its editorial of May 29, 1999, after</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>mentioning the UN intervention in Kosovo and Iraq, its</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>peace-keeping efforts and the accountability of crimes</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>against humanity, wrote: "And this is a doctrine that</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>could be applied to the Kashmir conflict, which was</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>never a simple border dispute between the UN member</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>states, or even an argument about to which of them a</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>province belonged.... The UN has some standing in</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Kashmir, too, as the guarantor of the referendum once</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>promised by the Indian government......... In the case of</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Kashmir, however, the UN is probably the only hope of</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>peaceful resolution." This is why the UN has to prove</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>that it means to do more than just looking after the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>interests of the powerful. It has to act alone on the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>issue of Kashmir if not allowed by Washington. </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>India has all along opposed the deployment of UN</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>peace force and the monitoring of LoC by UN</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>representatives, and this is a clear proof of India's mala</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>fide. India's case on Kargil is flimsy and full of</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>contradictions. But here again Pakistan has failed to</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>bring round the world opinion. Woe to the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>self-appointed custodians of international morality who</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>are looking the other way at this premeditated</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>massacre as if the Kashmiri blood is less sacrosanct</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>than the blood of the Kosovars and inhabitants of East</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Timor. This callousness has already convinced the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>bruised people in Kashmir that they are victim of the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>UN, US and its allies' double standards of human rights</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>and morality and that the aphorism that 'might is right'</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>is as relevant in the game of power in the closing</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>stages of the twentieth century as it was in the Gothic</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>ages. </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>The continuing crisis in Kashmir is provoking calls for</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>UN action. But with the UN unwilling to intervene</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>without the American and Indian permission there is</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>little leverage left to stop Indian occupation and</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>oppression in the occupied Kashmir. During the period</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>of struggle, 70,000 hapless Kashmiri freedom fighters</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>have been gunned down and thousands are facing the</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>same fate. The sole crime of the victims is that they</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>demanded their inalienable right to self-determination to</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>decide their future through a UN-supervised plebiscite</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>promised to them by the United Nations as well as by</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>India and Pakistan. But where is the UN?</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER> | |
| <H2> | |
| <IMG SRC="banner2.gif" HEIGHT=50 WIDTH=200></H2></CENTER> | |
| </TD> | |
| </TR> | |
| </TABLE></CENTER> | |
| <CENTER> </CENTER> | |
| <CENTER><TABLE BORDER COLS=1 WIDTH="100%" > | |
| <TR> | |
| <TD> | |
| <CENTER>Greets</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER>Mr_Sweet , AntiChrist , Devil-C , s0ften , 139_r00ted , FUBY , | |
| Forpaxe , McIntyre , ULG ,</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER> flipz , fuqrag , weLLfaRe , ALOC , ne0h , GOD , HiP | |
| , Legion 2000 , Xessor , mistuh clean ,</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER> exode , lyp0x , Da^Bomb , mozy , k0ld , Deicidal | |
| , HIT2000 , HcV , bl0w team , an0nym0us ,</CENTER> | |
| <CENTER> un1x b0wl1ng t34m , PS911 , syxx , cult_hero , LevelSeven | |
| , v00d00 , Hi-Tech Hate , gH , orfeuz , p4riah , analognet , OHB , [Narcissus] | |
| , The DDT , attrition.org , hackernews.com , dutchthreat.org , projectgamma.com | |
| , net-security.org , zataz.com and all the others i miss..</CENTER> | |
| </TD> | |
| </TR> | |
| </TABLE></CENTER> | |
| <CENTER> | |
| <H1> | |
| <FONT SIZE=+1>*<:0)</FONT></H1></CENTER> | |
| </BODY> | |
| </HTML> | |
| <!-- www.attrition.org web hack mirror - watermark or something --> |