Skip to content
Permalink
main
Switch branches/tags
Go to file
 
 
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>CDA II</TITLE>
<META NAME="DESCRIPTION" CONTENT="NAMBLA's goal is to end the oppression of men and boys who have mutually consensual relationships. NAMBLA's membership is open to everyone sympathetic to personal freedom.">
<META NAME="KEYWORDS" CONTENT="NAMBLA, NORTH AMERICAN MAN/BOY LOVE ASSOCIATION, MAN/BOY LOVE, BOYS, BOYS SPEAK OUT ON MAN/BOY LOVE, CDA II, COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT, WHAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING ABOUT NAMBLA AND MAN/BOY LOVE, POEMS OF LOVE AND LIBERATION, NAMBLA BULLETIN, NAMBLA TOPICS, NAMBLA NEWS, AGEISM, YOUTH, PEDOPHILIA, PEDERASTY, PEDOPHILE, PEDERAST, GAY YOUTH, INTERNATIONAL LESBIAN AND GAY ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL GAY AND LESBIAN YOUTH ORGANIZATION, PRISON, PRISONER, PRISONERS">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,follow">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Mozilla/3.04Gold (Win95; I) [Netscape]">
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" BGCOLOR="#FFFFEA" LINK="#0000EE" VLINK="#551A8B" ALINK="#FF0000">
<CENTER><P><B><FONT COLOR="#0000FF"><FONT SIZE=+3>Another &quot;Communications
Decency Act&quot;? </FONT></FONT></B></P></CENTER>
<P><A HREF="http://www.eff.org/br/"><IMG SRC="br.gif" BORDER=0 HEIGHT=76 WIDTH=112></A><FONT COLOR="#FB3504"><FONT SIZE=+1>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Yet
another &quot;Communications Decency Act&quot;! &nbsp;&nbsp;Suit has been
filed in Federal court to stop the tampering with communication on the
Internet. &nbsp;&nbsp;This legislation contains most of the unconstitutional
flaws of the original CDA: </FONT></FONT></P>
<UL>
<LI><FONT SIZE=+1>Though the sponsors of CDA&nbsp;II claim it is intended
to address only commercial pornographers intentionally targeting minors,
the actual language of the bill is vague and overbroad, and will sweep
in much more than explicit for-profit visual materials. The bill will censor
a wide variety of legitimate, protected expression, for adults as well
as children. </FONT><BR>
<BR>
</LI>
<LI><FONT SIZE=+1>Congress's own posting of the Starr report would likely
violate this Act of Congress. </FONT><BR>
<BR>
</LI>
<LI><FONT SIZE=+1>What is appropriate for some 5-year-olds is not the same
thing as what is appropriate for some 16-year-olds, and this bill fails
to take account of this basic fact. </FONT><BR>
<BR>
</LI>
<LI><FONT SIZE=+1>Intentionally providing a minor with &quot;harmful matter&quot;,
online or offline, is already illegal under general obscenity and harmful-to-minor
statutes. Congress cannot expand this to a ban on all online publication
(which the bill amounts to; the Supreme Court has already found that the
kind of age verification this bill, like the CDA, calls for is impractical).
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<FONT COLOR="#FB3504">A broad coalition has formed to defend Internet freedoms.
&nbsp;</FONT><FONT COLOR="#F02C0F">To find out the current status of this
campaign and learn what you can do to defend the Internet, click here:
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>
&nbsp;<BR>
</FONT>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<A HREF="http://www.eff.org/br/">http://www.eff.org/br/</A></FONT></LI>
<UL>
<UL>
<UL>
<P><FONT SIZE=+1>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></P>
</UL>
</UL>
</UL>
<P><A HREF="index.htm"><IMG SRC="m0p7nau7.gif" BORDER=0 HEIGHT=95 WIDTH=95></A><FONT COLOR="#8080FF">Copyright
&copy; NAMBLA, 1999. All rights reserved.</FONT><BR>
<BR>
</P>
</UL>
</BODY>
</HTML>