index.html

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="GForce Arts ">
<TITLE>:: GForce :: Yeh Undar Ki Baat Hai</TITLE>
<META NAME="Template" CONTENT="">
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#ffffff" LINK="#ffffff" VLINK="#00ff00" BGCOLOR="#0000ff" alink="#00FF00">

<P ALIGN="CENTER"><TBODY><BR>
</TBODY></P>

<P ALIGN="CENTER"><CENTER>
  <TABLE CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0 WIDTH=548 height="683">
    <TR>
      <TD VALIGN="TOP" BGCOLOR="#000000" HEIGHT=743>
        <P>&nbsp;</P>
        <DIR>
          <DIR>
            <DIR>
              <DIR>
                <DIR>
                  <DIR>
                    <p><B><I><FONT FACE="Arial,Helvetica" SIZE=2>GFORCE </font></i></b></p>
                  </DIR>
                </DIR>
              </DIR>
            </DIR>
          </DIR>
        </DIR>
        <P>India's False claim on Kashmir.</P>
        <P><font size="2">On October 28th 1993, Robin Raphel stated that Washington
          did not recognise the Instrument of Accession to India as meaning that
          Kashmir is not forever more an integral part of India. She expressed
          the view that the whole of Kashmir is disputed territory, the future
          status of which must be determined in accordance with the wishes of
          the people of Kashmir. </font></P>
        <P><font size="2">The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), based
          in Geneva, recently, passed a resolution proclaiming Kashmir's accession
          to India as bogus and null and void. The ICJ went further by condemning
          the human rights violations in Kashmir. These events serve to highlight
          the disputed status of Kashmir by focusing on the fraudulent nature
          of the Instrument of Accession which was 'signed' by the Mahrajah of
          Kashmir on 26th October 1947. </font></P>
        <P><font size="2">The Indians claim that the Instrument of Accession was
          signed by Mahrajah Hari Singh on 26th October 1947, in which the Mahrajah
          agreed to accede to India in return for military assistance to put down
          the popular rebellion against him, seen at that time as an invasion
          by tribesmen from neighbouring Pakistan. The details of the accession
          were worked out between the Kashmiri Prime Minister, MC Mahajan and
          the Indian official, VP Menon, in Dehli. However, there are serious
          doubts about the signing of the document. Alastair Lamb (in his book,
          Kashmir - A disputed legacy 1846-1990) points out that the Instrument
          of Accession could not have been signed by the Mahrajah on 26th October
          as he was travelling by road to Jammu (a distance of over 350 Km). </font></P>
        <P><font size="2">There is no evidence to suggest that a meeting or communication
          of any kind took place on 26th October 1947. In fact it was on 27th
          October 1947 that the Mahrajah was informed by his MC Mahajan and VP
          Menon (who had flown into Srinagar), the the Instrument of Accession
          had already been negotiated in Dehli. The Mahrajah did not in fact sign
          the Instrument of Accession, if at all, until 27th October 1947. This
          sheds doubts on the actions of the Indian regime. Some Indian troops
          had already arrived and secured Srinagar airfield during the middle
          of October 1947. On 26th October 1947, a further massive airlift brought
          thousands of Indian troops to Kashmir - BEFORE the signing of the Accession.
          Therefore, this situation begs the question: would the Mahrajah have
          signed the Instrument of Accession had the Indian troops not been on
          Kashmiri soil? </font></P>
        <P><font size="2">No satisfactory original of the Instrument of Accession
          has ever been produced in an international forum; a published form has
          always been shown. Further, the document was not presented to Pakistan
          or to the UN. In the summer of 1995, the Indian authorities reported
          the original document as lost or stolen. This sheds further doubt on
          whether the Mahrajah actually signed the Instrument of Accession. The
          Governor-General of India at the time, Lord Mountbatten, stipulated
          that the permanent accession of Kashmir to the Indian Union will only
          be accepted once the people of Kashmir had been consulted. He noted
          in a letter to the Mahrajah, "the question of the states's accession
          should be settled by a reference to the people". Furthermore, when the
          Kashmir crisis broke out in October 1947, the principle of reference
          to the people through plebiscite was already established as similar
          disputes in some other states had been resolved this way.</font></P>
        <P><font size="2"> The Indian Prime Minister J Nehru, accepted this principle
          and reiterated his position in a letter to the British Prime Minister
          on 25th October 1947, "our view, which we have repeatedly made public,
          is that the question of accession in any disputed territory must be
          decided in accordance with the wishes of the people and we adhere to
          this view". Therefore, at the time of the so-called accession, the Indian
          regime accepted the principle of reference to the people. Based on this
          principle, the Instrument of Accession should have been provisional
          and conditional upon the outcome of a plebiscite. When India took the
          Kashmir issue to the UN in 1948, it did so under article 35 of Chapter
          VI which outlines the means for a peaceful settlement of disputes. </font></P>
        <P><font size="2">It is interesting to note here that India did not present
          the Kashmir case under the UN Chapter VII which relates to acts of aggression
          as India was alleging Pakistan. Therefore, it is evident that by raising
          the issue under Chapter VI, India recognised the Kashmir issue as a
          dispute, thus conceding that the Instrument of Accession had not confirmed
          the state to be an integral part of India. India is still party to all
          the UN resolutions on Kashmir. Moreover, India and Pakistan accepted
          the UN resolutions of January 1948 calling for a plebiscite in Kashmir
          to exercise the right of self-determination of the people of Kashmir.
          India's acceptance of the UN resolutions establishes beyond a doubt,
          that the future of status of Kashmir would be determined by its people.
          Therefore, the Instrument of Accession, even if genuine, is rendered
          null and void</font></P>
        <P><font size="2">. In the past, attempts to hold a plebiscite have been
          met with fierce opposition from India. India has known, right from the
          start, that the result of a plebiscite is a foregone conclusion - the
          population of Kashmir would have voted to rid themselves of Indian rule.</font></P>
        <P><font size="2"> This has been the case from 26th October 1947 to the
          present day. On the practicality of holding a plebiscite, a paper by
          the US state department, presented to the UN on 2nd December 1947, noted
          , "the dominion of India may attempt to establish the extant electoral
          rolls on the basis for the referendum. As these rolls are said to contain
          less than 7% of the population and were compiled on a basis which served
          the weight to the members of the wealthiest educated Hindu majority
          who would obviously vote for accession to India, it is important that
          the electoral body should in fact be composed on a basis of complete
          adult suffrage in order that the result of the referendum may be representative
          of the actual wishes of the people of Kashmir".</font></P>
        <P><font size="2"> In view of the above arguments, it is clear that the
          Indian case on Kashmir is politically, legally and morally unjustified.
          The commitment made by India and the UN to allow the people of the state
          to choose their own future are neither time bound nor do they provide
          an escape clause for the Indian regime. It is only through fraud and
          repression that India continues to forcefully occupy a large portion
          of Kashmir</font></P>
        <P><font size="2">Please note, we are not a racist group, if you read
          all our stuff, you must realise our anger. We see people killed everyday,
          women raped, thick blood lying around, orphan children crying, and on
          the other hand, zee media (Indians) blame Pakistan for massacres and
          try to give a impression that Pakistan is responsible for the whole
          Kashmir issue,and we are responsible for every violence in Kahsmir.
          We like to apologise to any one that was offended by our defacement,
          even if it's a Indian. </font></P>
        <blockquote>
          <blockquote>
            <p>&nbsp;</p>
            <blockquote>
              <blockquote>
                <blockquote>
                  <blockquote>
                    <p><img src="dead3.jpg" width="116" height="83"> </p>
                  </blockquote>
                  <p><font face="Verdana" size=1>Indian Domination In Progess.</font></p>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
            </blockquote>
          </blockquote>
        </blockquote>
        <p><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE=1>Greets to : PHC #flem XPERiENCE crew, Attrition.org,</font><FONT SIZE=1>
          safemode.org </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE=1>Projectgamma.com, hackernews.com,
          packetstorm.securify.org, self-evident.com,</FONT> <FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE=1>rest
          of #!GFORCE and Freedom fighters of Kashmir (the mujhaideens), safemode.org,.hexa
          labs.MAN|AC, Peacemaker, msgmen0t, aekpani, , DEATHaCES, DEADgH0sT,
          cen, RR, symetrixx, , root66, Sysop, justagirl dayzee ,blueberry ,apathy13,
          antipent, Jaguar ,BigPoppa, PoWerPr0, bo-k-rra, core, bs, live, none(leviatan),&nbsp;
          cruciphux, SugarKing espionage, defcon, melt, slader, lyp0x, xessor,
          max0r, wrLiner, DA^BOMB, #rootworrm, axess, hwa-security, !b0f, all
          peeps at flem, rsh, f0rpaxe, Ursel ,Earizer ,stella, divine, isn, c65.org,
          incubus, oreo and who ever we've missed</FONT> </p>
        <P><A HREF="http://www9.50megs.com/gforce/mirror.htm"><B><font color="#FFFFFF">Previous
          work</font></B></A><font color="#FFFFFF"><B> | g-force@nightmail.com</b></font></P>
      </TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</CENTER><p></P>

<P ALIGN="CENTER">&nbsp;</P></BODY>
</HTML>
<!-- www.attrition.org web hack mirror - watermark or something -->
	<HTML>
	<HEAD>
	<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;">
	<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="GForce Arts ">
	<TITLE>:: GForce :: Yeh Undar Ki Baat Hai</TITLE>
	<META NAME="Template" CONTENT="">
	</HEAD>
	<BODY TEXT="#ffffff" LINK="#ffffff" VLINK="#00ff00" BGCOLOR="#0000ff" alink="#00FF00">

	<P ALIGN="CENTER"><TBODY><BR>
	</TBODY></P>

	<P ALIGN="CENTER"><CENTER>
	<TABLE CELLSPACING=0 BORDER=0 WIDTH=548 height="683">
	<TR>
	<TD VALIGN="TOP" BGCOLOR="#000000" HEIGHT=743>
	<P> </P>
	<DIR>
	<DIR>
	<DIR>
	<DIR>
	<DIR>
	<DIR>
	<p><B><I><FONT FACE="Arial,Helvetica" SIZE=2>GFORCE </font></i></b></p>
	</DIR>
	</DIR>
	</DIR>
	</DIR>
	</DIR>
	</DIR>
	<P>India's False claim on Kashmir.</P>
	<P><font size="2">On October 28th 1993, Robin Raphel stated that Washington
	did not recognise the Instrument of Accession to India as meaning that
	Kashmir is not forever more an integral part of India. She expressed
	the view that the whole of Kashmir is disputed territory, the future
	status of which must be determined in accordance with the wishes of
	the people of Kashmir. </font></P>
	<P><font size="2">The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), based
	in Geneva, recently, passed a resolution proclaiming Kashmir's accession
	to India as bogus and null and void. The ICJ went further by condemning
	the human rights violations in Kashmir. These events serve to highlight
	the disputed status of Kashmir by focusing on the fraudulent nature
	of the Instrument of Accession which was 'signed' by the Mahrajah of
	Kashmir on 26th October 1947. </font></P>
	<P><font size="2">The Indians claim that the Instrument of Accession was
	signed by Mahrajah Hari Singh on 26th October 1947, in which the Mahrajah
	agreed to accede to India in return for military assistance to put down
	the popular rebellion against him, seen at that time as an invasion
	by tribesmen from neighbouring Pakistan. The details of the accession
	were worked out between the Kashmiri Prime Minister, MC Mahajan and
	the Indian official, VP Menon, in Dehli. However, there are serious
	doubts about the signing of the document. Alastair Lamb (in his book,
	Kashmir - A disputed legacy 1846-1990) points out that the Instrument
	of Accession could not have been signed by the Mahrajah on 26th October
	as he was travelling by road to Jammu (a distance of over 350 Km). </font></P>
	<P><font size="2">There is no evidence to suggest that a meeting or communication
	of any kind took place on 26th October 1947. In fact it was on 27th
	October 1947 that the Mahrajah was informed by his MC Mahajan and VP
	Menon (who had flown into Srinagar), the the Instrument of Accession
	had already been negotiated in Dehli. The Mahrajah did not in fact sign
	the Instrument of Accession, if at all, until 27th October 1947. This
	sheds doubts on the actions of the Indian regime. Some Indian troops
	had already arrived and secured Srinagar airfield during the middle
	of October 1947. On 26th October 1947, a further massive airlift brought
	thousands of Indian troops to Kashmir - BEFORE the signing of the Accession.
	Therefore, this situation begs the question: would the Mahrajah have
	signed the Instrument of Accession had the Indian troops not been on
	Kashmiri soil? </font></P>
	<P><font size="2">No satisfactory original of the Instrument of Accession
	has ever been produced in an international forum; a published form has
	always been shown. Further, the document was not presented to Pakistan
	or to the UN. In the summer of 1995, the Indian authorities reported
	the original document as lost or stolen. This sheds further doubt on
	whether the Mahrajah actually signed the Instrument of Accession. The
	Governor-General of India at the time, Lord Mountbatten, stipulated
	that the permanent accession of Kashmir to the Indian Union will only
	be accepted once the people of Kashmir had been consulted. He noted
	in a letter to the Mahrajah, "the question of the states's accession
	should be settled by a reference to the people". Furthermore, when the
	Kashmir crisis broke out in October 1947, the principle of reference
	to the people through plebiscite was already established as similar
	disputes in some other states had been resolved this way.</font></P>
	<P><font size="2"> The Indian Prime Minister J Nehru, accepted this principle
	and reiterated his position in a letter to the British Prime Minister
	on 25th October 1947, "our view, which we have repeatedly made public,
	is that the question of accession in any disputed territory must be
	decided in accordance with the wishes of the people and we adhere to
	this view". Therefore, at the time of the so-called accession, the Indian
	regime accepted the principle of reference to the people. Based on this
	principle, the Instrument of Accession should have been provisional
	and conditional upon the outcome of a plebiscite. When India took the
	Kashmir issue to the UN in 1948, it did so under article 35 of Chapter
	VI which outlines the means for a peaceful settlement of disputes. </font></P>
	<P><font size="2">It is interesting to note here that India did not present
	the Kashmir case under the UN Chapter VII which relates to acts of aggression
	as India was alleging Pakistan. Therefore, it is evident that by raising
	the issue under Chapter VI, India recognised the Kashmir issue as a
	dispute, thus conceding that the Instrument of Accession had not confirmed
	the state to be an integral part of India. India is still party to all
	the UN resolutions on Kashmir. Moreover, India and Pakistan accepted
	the UN resolutions of January 1948 calling for a plebiscite in Kashmir
	to exercise the right of self-determination of the people of Kashmir.
	India's acceptance of the UN resolutions establishes beyond a doubt,
	that the future of status of Kashmir would be determined by its people.
	Therefore, the Instrument of Accession, even if genuine, is rendered
	null and void</font></P>
	<P><font size="2">. In the past, attempts to hold a plebiscite have been
	met with fierce opposition from India. India has known, right from the
	start, that the result of a plebiscite is a foregone conclusion - the
	population of Kashmir would have voted to rid themselves of Indian rule.</font></P>
	<P><font size="2"> This has been the case from 26th October 1947 to the
	present day. On the practicality of holding a plebiscite, a paper by
	the US state department, presented to the UN on 2nd December 1947, noted
	, "the dominion of India may attempt to establish the extant electoral
	rolls on the basis for the referendum. As these rolls are said to contain
	less than 7% of the population and were compiled on a basis which served
	the weight to the members of the wealthiest educated Hindu majority
	who would obviously vote for accession to India, it is important that
	the electoral body should in fact be composed on a basis of complete
	adult suffrage in order that the result of the referendum may be representative
	of the actual wishes of the people of Kashmir".</font></P>
	<P><font size="2"> In view of the above arguments, it is clear that the
	Indian case on Kashmir is politically, legally and morally unjustified.
	The commitment made by India and the UN to allow the people of the state
	to choose their own future are neither time bound nor do they provide
	an escape clause for the Indian regime. It is only through fraud and
	repression that India continues to forcefully occupy a large portion
	of Kashmir</font></P>
	<P><font size="2">Please note, we are not a racist group, if you read
	all our stuff, you must realise our anger. We see people killed everyday,
	women raped, thick blood lying around, orphan children crying, and on
	the other hand, zee media (Indians) blame Pakistan for massacres and
	try to give a impression that Pakistan is responsible for the whole
	Kashmir issue,and we are responsible for every violence in Kahsmir.
	We like to apologise to any one that was offended by our defacement,
	even if it's a Indian. </font></P>
	<blockquote>
	<blockquote>
	<p> </p>
	<blockquote>
	<blockquote>
	<blockquote>
	<blockquote>
	<p><img src="dead3.jpg" width="116" height="83"> </p>
	</blockquote>
	<p><font face="Verdana" size=1>Indian Domination In Progess.</font></p>
	</blockquote>
	</blockquote>
	</blockquote>
	</blockquote>
	</blockquote>
	<p><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE=1>Greets to : PHC #flem XPERiENCE crew, Attrition.org,</font><FONT SIZE=1>
	safemode.org </FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE=1>Projectgamma.com, hackernews.com,
	packetstorm.securify.org, self-evident.com,</FONT> <FONT FACE="Verdana" SIZE=1>rest
	of #!GFORCE and Freedom fighters of Kashmir (the mujhaideens), safemode.org,.hexa
	labs.MAN\|AC, Peacemaker, msgmen0t, aekpani, , DEATHaCES, DEADgH0sT,
	cen, RR, symetrixx, , root66, Sysop, justagirl dayzee ,blueberry ,apathy13,
	antipent, Jaguar ,BigPoppa, PoWerPr0, bo-k-rra, core, bs, live, none(leviatan),
	cruciphux, SugarKing espionage, defcon, melt, slader, lyp0x, xessor,
	max0r, wrLiner, DA^BOMB, #rootworrm, axess, hwa-security, !b0f, all
	peeps at flem, rsh, f0rpaxe, Ursel ,Earizer ,stella, divine, isn, c65.org,
	incubus, oreo and who ever we've missed</FONT> </p>
	<P><A HREF="http://www9.50megs.com/gforce/mirror.htm"><B><font color="#FFFFFF">Previous
	work</font></B></A><font color="#FFFFFF"><B> \| g-force@nightmail.com</b></font></P>
	</TD>
	</TR>
	</TABLE>
	</CENTER><p></P>

	<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P></BODY>
	</HTML>
	<!-- www.attrition.org web hack mirror - watermark or something -->