mirror.html

<html>
<head>
<title>:: GForce :: Yeh Ander Kee Baath Hai</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>

<body text="#FFFFFF" link="#009900" vlink="#009900" alink="#FF3333" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" bgcolor="#000000">
<table ALIGN="CENTER" width="74%" border="0">
  <tr align="center">
    <td>
      <div align="center"><img src="GFORCE.jpg" width="375" height="157"></div>
    </td>
  </tr>
  <tr align="center" valign="top">
    <td>
      <p align="left">
      <P align="left">
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">India's False claim on Kashmir.</font></P>
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">On October 28th 1993, Robin
        Raphel stated that Washington did not recognise the Instrument of Accession
        to India as meaning that Kashmir is not forever more an integral part
        of India. She expressed the view that the whole of Kashmir is disputed
        territory, the future status of which must be determined in accordance
        with the wishes of the people of Kashmir. </font></P>
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">The International Commission
        of Jurists (ICJ), based in Geneva, recently, passed a resolution proclaiming
        Kashmir's accession to India as bogus and null and void. The ICJ went
        further by condemning the human rights violations in Kashmir. These events
        serve to highlight the disputed status of Kashmir by focusing on the fraudulent
        nature of the Instrument of Accession which was 'signed' by the Mahrajah
        of Kashmir on 26th October 1947. </font></P>
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">The Indians claim that the
        Instrument of Accession was signed by Mahrajah Hari Singh on 26th October
        1947, in which the Mahrajah agreed to accede to India in return for military
        assistance to put down the popular rebellion against him, seen at that
        time as an invasion by tribesmen from neighbouring Pakistan. The details
        of the accession were worked out between the Kashmiri Prime Minister,
        MC Mahajan and the Indian official, VP Menon, in Dehli. However, there
        are serious doubts about the signing of the document. Alastair Lamb (in
        his book, Kashmir - A disputed legacy 1846-1990) points out that the Instrument
        of Accession could not have been signed by the Mahrajah on 26th October
        as he was travelling by road to Jammu (a distance of over 350 Km). </font></P>
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">There is no evidence to suggest
        that a meeting or communication of any kind took place on 26th October
        1947. In fact it was on 27th October 1947 that the Mahrajah was informed
        by his MC Mahajan and VP Menon (who had flown into Srinagar), the the
        Instrument of Accession had already been negotiated in Dehli. The Mahrajah
        did not in fact sign the Instrument of Accession, if at all, until 27th
        October 1947. This sheds doubts on the actions of the Indian regime. Some
        Indian troops had already arrived and secured Srinagar airfield during
        the middle of October 1947. On 26th October 1947, a further massive airlift
        brought thousands of Indian troops to Kashmir - BEFORE the signing of
        the Accession. Therefore, this situation begs the question: would the
        Mahrajah have signed the Instrument of Accession had the Indian troops
        not been on Kashmiri soil? </font></P>
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">No satisfactory original of
        the Instrument of Accession has ever been produced in an international
        forum; a published form has always been shown. Further, the document was
        not presented to Pakistan or to the UN. In the summer of 1995, the Indian
        authorities reported the original document as lost or stolen. This sheds
        further doubt on whether the Mahrajah actually signed the Instrument of
        Accession. The Governor-General of India at the time, Lord Mountbatten,
        stipulated that the permanent accession of Kashmir to the Indian Union
        will only be accepted once the people of Kashmir had been consulted. He
        noted in a letter to the Mahrajah, "the question of the states's accession
        should be settled by a reference to the people". Furthermore, when the
        Kashmir crisis broke out in October 1947, the principle of reference to
        the people through plebiscite was already established as similar disputes
        in some other states had been resolved this way.</font></P>
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">The Indian Prime Minister
        J Nehru, accepted this principle and reiterated his position in a letter
        to the British Prime Minister on 25th October 1947, "our view, which we
        have repeatedly made public, is that the question of accession in any
        disputed territory must be decided in accordance with the wishes of the
        people and we adhere to this view". Therefore, at the time of the so-called
        accession, the Indian regime accepted the principle of reference to the
        people. Based on this principle, the Instrument of Accession should have
        been provisional and conditional upon the outcome of a plebiscite. When
        India took the Kashmir issue to the UN in 1948, it did so under article
        35 of Chapter VI which outlines the means for a peaceful settlement of
        disputes. </font></P>
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">It is interesting to note
        here that India did not present the Kashmir case under the UN Chapter
        VII which relates to acts of aggression as India was alleging Pakistan.
        Therefore, it is evident that by raising the issue under Chapter VI, India
        recognised the Kashmir issue as a dispute, thus conceding that the Instrument
        of Accession had not confirmed the state to be an integral part of India.
        India is still party to all the UN resolutions on Kashmir. Moreover, India
        and Pakistan accepted the UN resolutions of January 1948 calling for a
        plebiscite in Kashmir to exercise the right of self-determination of the
        people of Kashmir. India's acceptance of the UN resolutions establishes
        beyond a doubt, that the future of status of Kashmir would be determined
        by its people. Therefore, the Instrument of Accession, even if genuine,
        is rendered null and void</font></P>
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">. In the past, attempts to
        hold a plebiscite have been met with fierce opposition from India. India
        has known, right from the start, that the result of a plebiscite is a
        foregone conclusion - the population of Kashmir would have voted to rid
        themselves of Indian rule.</font></P>
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">This has been the case from
        26th October 1947 to the present day. On the practicality of holding a
        plebiscite, a paper by the US state department, presented to the UN on
        2nd December 1947, noted , "the dominion of India may attempt to establish
        the extant electoral rolls on the basis for the referendum. As these rolls
        are said to contain less than 7% of the population and were compiled on
        a basis which served the weight to the members of the wealthiest educated
        Hindu majority who would obviously vote for accession to India, it is
        important that the electoral body should in fact be composed on a basis
        of complete adult suffrage in order that the result of the referendum
        may be representative of the actual wishes of the people of Kashmir".</font></P>
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">In view of the above arguments,
        it is clear that the Indian case on Kashmir is politically, legally and
        morally unjustified. The commitment made by India and the UN to allow
        the people of the state to choose their own future are neither time bound
        nor do they provide an escape clause for the Indian regime. It is only
        through fraud and repression that India continues to forcefully occupy
        a large portion of Kashmir</font></P>
      <P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">Please note, we are not a
        racist group, if you read all our stuff, you must realise our anger. We
        see people killed everyday, women raped, thick blood lying around, orphan
        children crying, and on the other hand, zee media (Indians) blame Pakistan
        for massacres and try to give a impression that Pakistan is responsible
        for the whole Kashmir issue,and we are responsible for every violence
        in Kahsmir. We like to apologise to any one that was offended by our defacement,
        even if it's a Indian. W</font></P>
      <BLOCKQUOTE>
        <BLOCKQUOTE>
          <BLOCKQUOTE>
            <BLOCKQUOTE>
              <BLOCKQUOTE>&nbsp;</BLOCKQUOTE>
            </BLOCKQUOTE>
          </BLOCKQUOTE>
        </BLOCKQUOTE>
      </BLOCKQUOTE>
      </td>
  </tr>
  <tr align="center" valign="top">
    <td>
      <blockquote>
        <p align="center"><font size="1"><img height=83 src="dead3.jpeg" width=116>
          </font></p>
      </blockquote>
      <p align="center"> <br>
        <font face="Courier" size="2" color="#66FF66">[Indian Domination In Progess]</font></p>
              </td>
  </tr>
  <tr align="center" valign="top">
    <td align="justify">
      <div align="left">
        <p><font color="#CCCCCC"><br>
          <img src="greets.jpg" width="102" height="29"><br>
          <font face="Verdana" size="1" color="#FFFFFF">PHC #flem XPERiENCE crew,
          Attrition.org, safemode.org Projectgamma.com, hackernews.com, packetstorm.securify.org,
          self-evident.com, rest of #!GFORCE and Freedom fighters of Kashmir (the
          mujhaideens), safemode.org,.hexa labs.MAN|AC, Peacemaker, msgmen0t,
          aekpani, , DEATHaCES, DEADgH0sT, cen, RR, symetrixx, , root66, Sysop,
          justagirl dayzee ,blueberry ,apathy13, antipent, Jaguar ,BigPoppa, PoWerPr0,
          bo-k-rra, core, bs, live, none(leviatan), cruciphux, SugarKing espionage,
          defcon, melt, slader, lyp0x, xessor, max0r, wrLiner, DA^BOMB, #rootworrm,
          axess, hwa-security, !b0f, all peeps at flem, rsh, f0rpaxe, Ursel ,Earizer
          ,stella, divine, isn, c65.org, incubus, oreo, hackweiser, ZOLO,. <font color="#999999">Alldas.de</font>
          another very good/stable mirroring website for hacks (defaced@alldas.de),
          ADM ofcourse.</font></font><font color="#CCCCCC"><br>
          <a href="http://www9.50megs.com/gforce/mirror.htm"><br>
          <img src="previous.jpg" width="146" height="29" border="0"></a><br>
          <a href="mailto:g-force@nightmail.com"><img src="Contact.jpg" width="81" height="29" border="0"></a></font></p>
        <p><font color="#CCCCCC"> </font> </p>
      </div>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!-- www.attrition.org web hack mirror - watermark or something -->
	<html>
	<head>
	<title>:: GForce :: Yeh Ander Kee Baath Hai</title>
	<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
	</head>

	<body text="#FFFFFF" link="#009900" vlink="#009900" alink="#FF3333" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" bgcolor="#000000">
	<table ALIGN="CENTER" width="74%" border="0">
	<tr align="center">
	<td>
	<div align="center"><img src="GFORCE.jpg" width="375" height="157"></div>
	</td>
	</tr>
	<tr align="center" valign="top">
	<td>
	<p align="left">
	<P align="left">
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">India's False claim on Kashmir.</font></P>
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">On October 28th 1993, Robin
	Raphel stated that Washington did not recognise the Instrument of Accession
	to India as meaning that Kashmir is not forever more an integral part
	of India. She expressed the view that the whole of Kashmir is disputed
	territory, the future status of which must be determined in accordance
	with the wishes of the people of Kashmir. </font></P>
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">The International Commission
	of Jurists (ICJ), based in Geneva, recently, passed a resolution proclaiming
	Kashmir's accession to India as bogus and null and void. The ICJ went
	further by condemning the human rights violations in Kashmir. These events
	serve to highlight the disputed status of Kashmir by focusing on the fraudulent
	nature of the Instrument of Accession which was 'signed' by the Mahrajah
	of Kashmir on 26th October 1947. </font></P>
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">The Indians claim that the
	Instrument of Accession was signed by Mahrajah Hari Singh on 26th October
	1947, in which the Mahrajah agreed to accede to India in return for military
	assistance to put down the popular rebellion against him, seen at that
	time as an invasion by tribesmen from neighbouring Pakistan. The details
	of the accession were worked out between the Kashmiri Prime Minister,
	MC Mahajan and the Indian official, VP Menon, in Dehli. However, there
	are serious doubts about the signing of the document. Alastair Lamb (in
	his book, Kashmir - A disputed legacy 1846-1990) points out that the Instrument
	of Accession could not have been signed by the Mahrajah on 26th October
	as he was travelling by road to Jammu (a distance of over 350 Km). </font></P>
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">There is no evidence to suggest
	that a meeting or communication of any kind took place on 26th October
	1947. In fact it was on 27th October 1947 that the Mahrajah was informed
	by his MC Mahajan and VP Menon (who had flown into Srinagar), the the
	Instrument of Accession had already been negotiated in Dehli. The Mahrajah
	did not in fact sign the Instrument of Accession, if at all, until 27th
	October 1947. This sheds doubts on the actions of the Indian regime. Some
	Indian troops had already arrived and secured Srinagar airfield during
	the middle of October 1947. On 26th October 1947, a further massive airlift
	brought thousands of Indian troops to Kashmir - BEFORE the signing of
	the Accession. Therefore, this situation begs the question: would the
	Mahrajah have signed the Instrument of Accession had the Indian troops
	not been on Kashmiri soil? </font></P>
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">No satisfactory original of
	the Instrument of Accession has ever been produced in an international
	forum; a published form has always been shown. Further, the document was
	not presented to Pakistan or to the UN. In the summer of 1995, the Indian
	authorities reported the original document as lost or stolen. This sheds
	further doubt on whether the Mahrajah actually signed the Instrument of
	Accession. The Governor-General of India at the time, Lord Mountbatten,
	stipulated that the permanent accession of Kashmir to the Indian Union
	will only be accepted once the people of Kashmir had been consulted. He
	noted in a letter to the Mahrajah, "the question of the states's accession
	should be settled by a reference to the people". Furthermore, when the
	Kashmir crisis broke out in October 1947, the principle of reference to
	the people through plebiscite was already established as similar disputes
	in some other states had been resolved this way.</font></P>
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">The Indian Prime Minister
	J Nehru, accepted this principle and reiterated his position in a letter
	to the British Prime Minister on 25th October 1947, "our view, which we
	have repeatedly made public, is that the question of accession in any
	disputed territory must be decided in accordance with the wishes of the
	people and we adhere to this view". Therefore, at the time of the so-called
	accession, the Indian regime accepted the principle of reference to the
	people. Based on this principle, the Instrument of Accession should have
	been provisional and conditional upon the outcome of a plebiscite. When
	India took the Kashmir issue to the UN in 1948, it did so under article
	35 of Chapter VI which outlines the means for a peaceful settlement of
	disputes. </font></P>
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">It is interesting to note
	here that India did not present the Kashmir case under the UN Chapter
	VII which relates to acts of aggression as India was alleging Pakistan.
	Therefore, it is evident that by raising the issue under Chapter VI, India
	recognised the Kashmir issue as a dispute, thus conceding that the Instrument
	of Accession had not confirmed the state to be an integral part of India.
	India is still party to all the UN resolutions on Kashmir. Moreover, India
	and Pakistan accepted the UN resolutions of January 1948 calling for a
	plebiscite in Kashmir to exercise the right of self-determination of the
	people of Kashmir. India's acceptance of the UN resolutions establishes
	beyond a doubt, that the future of status of Kashmir would be determined
	by its people. Therefore, the Instrument of Accession, even if genuine,
	is rendered null and void</font></P>
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">. In the past, attempts to
	hold a plebiscite have been met with fierce opposition from India. India
	has known, right from the start, that the result of a plebiscite is a
	foregone conclusion - the population of Kashmir would have voted to rid
	themselves of Indian rule.</font></P>
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">This has been the case from
	26th October 1947 to the present day. On the practicality of holding a
	plebiscite, a paper by the US state department, presented to the UN on
	2nd December 1947, noted , "the dominion of India may attempt to establish
	the extant electoral rolls on the basis for the referendum. As these rolls
	are said to contain less than 7% of the population and were compiled on
	a basis which served the weight to the members of the wealthiest educated
	Hindu majority who would obviously vote for accession to India, it is
	important that the electoral body should in fact be composed on a basis
	of complete adult suffrage in order that the result of the referendum
	may be representative of the actual wishes of the people of Kashmir".</font></P>
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">In view of the above arguments,
	it is clear that the Indian case on Kashmir is politically, legally and
	morally unjustified. The commitment made by India and the UN to allow
	the people of the state to choose their own future are neither time bound
	nor do they provide an escape clause for the Indian regime. It is only
	through fraud and repression that India continues to forcefully occupy
	a large portion of Kashmir</font></P>
	<P align="left"><font size="1" face="Verdana">Please note, we are not a
	racist group, if you read all our stuff, you must realise our anger. We
	see people killed everyday, women raped, thick blood lying around, orphan
	children crying, and on the other hand, zee media (Indians) blame Pakistan
	for massacres and try to give a impression that Pakistan is responsible
	for the whole Kashmir issue,and we are responsible for every violence
	in Kahsmir. We like to apologise to any one that was offended by our defacement,
	even if it's a Indian. W</font></P>
	<BLOCKQUOTE>
	<BLOCKQUOTE>
	<BLOCKQUOTE>
	<BLOCKQUOTE>
	<BLOCKQUOTE> </BLOCKQUOTE>
	</BLOCKQUOTE>
	</BLOCKQUOTE>
	</BLOCKQUOTE>
	</BLOCKQUOTE>
	</td>
	</tr>
	<tr align="center" valign="top">
	<td>
	<blockquote>
	<p align="center"><font size="1"><img height=83 src="dead3.jpeg" width=116>
	</font></p>
	</blockquote>
	<p align="center"> <br>
	<font face="Courier" size="2" color="#66FF66">[Indian Domination In Progess]</font></p>
	</td>
	</tr>
	<tr align="center" valign="top">
	<td align="justify">
	<div align="left">
	<p><font color="#CCCCCC"><br>
	<img src="greets.jpg" width="102" height="29"><br>
	<font face="Verdana" size="1" color="#FFFFFF">PHC #flem XPERiENCE crew,
	Attrition.org, safemode.org Projectgamma.com, hackernews.com, packetstorm.securify.org,
	self-evident.com, rest of #!GFORCE and Freedom fighters of Kashmir (the
	mujhaideens), safemode.org,.hexa labs.MAN\|AC, Peacemaker, msgmen0t,
	aekpani, , DEATHaCES, DEADgH0sT, cen, RR, symetrixx, , root66, Sysop,
	justagirl dayzee ,blueberry ,apathy13, antipent, Jaguar ,BigPoppa, PoWerPr0,
	bo-k-rra, core, bs, live, none(leviatan), cruciphux, SugarKing espionage,
	defcon, melt, slader, lyp0x, xessor, max0r, wrLiner, DA^BOMB, #rootworrm,
	axess, hwa-security, !b0f, all peeps at flem, rsh, f0rpaxe, Ursel ,Earizer
	,stella, divine, isn, c65.org, incubus, oreo, hackweiser, ZOLO,. <font color="#999999">Alldas.de</font>
	another very good/stable mirroring website for hacks (defaced@alldas.de),
	ADM ofcourse.</font></font><font color="#CCCCCC"><br>
	<a href="http://www9.50megs.com/gforce/mirror.htm"><br>
	<img src="previous.jpg" width="146" height="29" border="0"></a><br>
	<a href="mailto:g-force@nightmail.com"><img src="Contact.jpg" width="81" height="29" border="0"></a></font></p>
	<p><font color="#CCCCCC"> </font> </p>
	</div>
	</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
	</body>
	</html>
	<!-- www.attrition.org web hack mirror - watermark or something -->