Hyperalignment

[tiborauer]

Does anybody know what it is? I can see it in the parameter set, but no module is using it.

[jooh]

Looks like remnants of legacy stuff to me.

aa_engine/aas_getdirectory_bydomain.m:    case 'hyperalignment_searchlight_package'
aa_engine/aas_getdirectory_bydomain.m:        directory=sprintf(['hyperalignment_searchlight_packages' filesep '%d'],index);
aa_engine/aas_getdirectory_bydomain.m:    case {'subject','hyperalignment_subject','isc_subject'} 
aa_engine/aas_getNames_bydomain.m:        case 'hyperalignment_searchlight_package'
aa_engine/aas_getNames_bydomain.m:        case 'hyperalignment_subject' 
aa_engine/aas_getN_bydomain.m:    case {'searchlight_package','hyperalignment_searchlight_package'}
aa_engine/aas_getN_bydomain.m:    case {'subject','hyperalignment_subject','isc_subject'}
aa_testcode/aatest_dependencies.m:% Source is hyperalignment_searchlight_package, target is subject[ 3 ]: hyperalignment_searchlight_package[ 1 ] hyperalignment_subject[ 1 1 ] hyperalignment_subject[ 1 2 ] hyperalignment_subject[ 1 3 ] hyperalignment_subject[ 1 4 ] hyperalignment_searchlight_package[ 2 ] hyperalignment_subject[ 2 1 ] hyperalignment_subject[ 2 2 ] hyperalignment_subject[ 2 3 ] hyperalignment_subject[ 2 4 ]  
aa_testcode/aatest_dependencies.m:% Source is hyperalignment_searchlight_package, target is subject[ 3 ]: hyperalignment_searchlight_package[ 1 ] hyperalignment_searchlight_package[ 2 ] 
aa_testcode/aatest_dependencies.m:    [deps commonind desc]=aas_getdependencies_bydomain(aap,'hyperalignment_searchlight_package','subject',[3],wtr_list{wtrind},1);
aa_testcode/aatest_dependencies.m:    fprintf('Source is hyperalignment_searchlight_package, target is subject[ 3 ]: %s\n',desc);

[tiborauer]

We should then remove it from the settings and the code.

[jooh]

Happy to take care of that if @rhodricusack has no objections?

[tiborauer]

I think you can go ahead.

[jpeelle]

Closing this based on our discussions - @jooh will remove in a future PR (if not already, sorry I may have missed it).

[tiborauer]

No, It is not covered by #161 (or #163).