Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move util.spawn to a new module, add ability to spawn with properties #489

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 10, 2015

Conversation

blueyed
Copy link
Member

@blueyed blueyed commented Sep 28, 2015

  • This commit add a new module to avoid a (4 level) loop dependency
  • It is now possible to call awful.spawn() with a table of properties
  • awful.rules is used to execute the rules.
  • Everything is public to allow alternative workflow modules such as
    Tyrannical to use their own callback implementation.

Successor of #34 to make Travis pick it up.

@Elv13
Copy link
Member

Elv13 commented Sep 29, 2015

The typo has been fixed

@blueyed blueyed added this to the next: pull requests to be merged soon milestone Sep 29, 2015
@Elv13 Elv13 force-pushed the snid_callback branch 2 times, most recently from 6fc54b9 to 4095eb9 Compare September 29, 2015 22:04
* This commit add a new module to avoid a (4 level) loop dependency
* It is now possible to call awful.spawn() with a table of properties
* awful.rules is used to execute the rules.

* Everything is public to allow alternative workflow modules such as
    Tyrannical to use their own callback implementation.
@Elv13
Copy link
Member

Elv13 commented Sep 29, 2015

Ok, I fixed Travis (forgot to include LGI in spawn.lua, as required by the new async method)

@blueyed
Copy link
Member Author

blueyed commented Oct 2, 2015

I agree with @nuko8 that the default config should make use of it.

@Elv13
Do you feel like doing this? Otherwise I could add it, but then would have to adopt the PR or move it over to the orga's repo.

@psychon psychon merged commit 4095eb9 into awesomeWM:master Oct 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants