Commits on Jun 5, 2013
  1. Merge pull request junit-team#647 from noel-yap/filter-option

    dsaff committed Jun 5, 2013
    --filter option implemented.
Commits on Jun 3, 2013
Commits on May 28, 2013
  1. Merge pull request junit-team#659 from brettchabot/master

    dsaff committed May 28, 2013
    Collect annotations for JUnit3 test methods.
Commits on May 27, 2013
Commits on May 24, 2013
  1. Merge pull request junit-team#678 from marschall/epl

    dsaff committed May 24, 2013
    Relicense JUnit from CPL to EPL
Commits on May 23, 2013
  1. Merge pull request junit-team#680 from UrsMetz/fix-typo-in-method-rul…

    dsaff committed May 23, 2013
    fix typo in javadoc for MethodRule
Commits on May 22, 2013
  1. fix typo in javadoc

    UrsMetz committed May 22, 2013
Commits on May 19, 2013
  1. Relicense JUnit from CPL to EPL

    marschall committed May 18, 2013
    EPL is the successor version of the CPL this makes re-licensing
    possible without seeking the approval of all contributors.
    CPL is actively hurting JUnit adaptation, it the following cases the
    deciding factor against JUnit was CPL. In both cases EPL would have
    been fine.
    * Netbeans can't ship JUnit [4]
    * OpenJDK uses TestNG instead of JUnit [5]
    Mike Milinkovich from the Eclipse Foundation wrote [1]
    > Back in 2009, the CPL was superseded by the EPL. This means that the
    > EPL is the successor version of the CPL. It also means that using the
    > CPL is the licensing equivalent of using deprecated code.
    > Because the EPL is the successor version to the CPL, the "new version
    > re-licensing" clause in Section 7 of the CPL applies. In other words,
    > you can re-license your project without seeking the approval of all
    > of your contributors.
    > The CPL and EPL basically differ by about one sentence, which you can
    > see here. The difference relates to the scope of patent licenses
    > terminated should someone sue another party for patent infringement.
    > This is the kind of stuff that lawyers love, but most developers
    > don't really care about.
    On the migration from CPL to EPL Mike Milinkovich wrote [2]
    > There was a two step process that was followed to make this happen.
    > First, following the terms of the CPL, IBM assigned the
    > responsibility to serve as the Agreement Steward of the CPL to the
    > Eclipse Foundation. Second, the Eclipse Foundation officially
    > recognized the EPL 1.0 as the new version of the CPL 1.0. In OSI
    > license terminology, the EPL now supersedes the CPL.
    > A quick read of the two licenses will quickly show that they are very
    > very close. Other than their names and (previously) their Agreement
    > Stewards, the only substantive difference is the breadth of the
    > patent license termination in the event of a patent law suit. (See
    > the second paragraph of Section 7.) For more information on the
    > relationship between the CPL and the EPL see the EPL FAQ.
    You can find more information about the difference at [3].
    The new `LICENSE.txt` is based on a plain text version of the EPL with
    formatted so that the diff is a clean as possible.
    I'll submit another pull request for the gh-pages branch.
Commits on May 9, 2013
  1. Merge pull request junit-team#675 from avandeursen/compactfailuretest

    dsaff committed May 9, 2013
    Test class for String Comparison Compactors, and off-by-one refactoring of compactor.
Commits on May 8, 2013
  1. Refactoring ensuring fSuffix is equal to length of suffix.

    avandeursen committed May 6, 2013
    While fPrefix was equal to length of prefix, in old code
    fSuffix was equal to length of suffix + 1.
    Made the two consistent, resulting in simplification of suffix
    computation (removed "+ 1" four times, added "- 1" once).
    Found inconsistency through branch coverage analysis, which
    suggested that condition "fSuffix > 0" could never be false.
  2. Switching to a Parameterized test class.

    avandeursen committed May 5, 2013
    Added long pre/postfix test cases.
    All relevant test cases for message compacting included.
    Included tests cases from (old) ComparisonCompactorTest
    that are still relevant for current ComparisonFailure class.
    Added empty string boundary cases.
    Branch coverage back to normal.
  3. Created an initial test case for ComparisonFailures

    avandeursen committed May 8, 2013
    Partly Taken from the old junit.framework.ComparisonCompactorTest.
    Also added test cases for strings with common suffix/prefix.
Commits on May 6, 2013
Commits on May 2, 2013
  1. Cleaned up whitespace in JUnit38ClassRunner.

    brettchabot committed May 2, 2013
    Added a unit test.
Commits on Apr 30, 2013
  1. JavaDoc fixed.

    november-yankee committed Apr 30, 2013
Commits on Apr 29, 2013
Commits on Apr 8, 2013
  1. Merge pull request junit-team#660 from Tibor17/junit.tests

    dsaff committed Apr 8, 2013
    Too short timeout in TimeoutRuleTest.
  2. Merge pull request junit-team#661 from Tibor17/junit.mavenize3

    dsaff committed Apr 8, 2013
    Wrong href link for Java API in JUnit Javadoc.
  3. Merge pull request junit-team#662 from pimterry/theory-javadoc

    dsaff committed Apr 8, 2013
    JavaDoc for TestedOn and ParametersSuppliedBy
Commits on Apr 7, 2013
Commits on Apr 6, 2013
Commits on Apr 2, 2013
  1. Collect annotations for JUnit3 tests.

    brettchabot committed Apr 2, 2013
    Necessary to support test filtering by annotation.
  2. Merge pull request junit-team#658 from pimterry/iterable-datapoints

    dsaff committed Apr 2, 2013
    Added support for iterable datapoints
Commits on Apr 1, 2013
  1. Merge pull request junit-team#657 from kcooney/simplify-fail-on-timeout

    dsaff committed Apr 1, 2013
    Simplify FailOnTimeout by using FutureTask
Commits on Mar 31, 2013