Conversation
WillianAgostini
force-pushed
the
feat/5924
branch
from
0ff8b85 to
30ffdb5
Compare
WillianAgostini
force-pushed
the
feat/5924
branch
from
0818d71 to
d33d072
Compare
|
👋 Any chance this can move forward? Thanks! |
|
It's a year later... any update on this? Or any way to work-around it? |
jasonsaayman
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2025
Member
jasonsaayman
left a comment
jasonsaayman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thanks for another great contribution @WillianAgostini
Member
sorry i have not been to great at getting these merged but i am back at it with renewed focus and this one will make it into the next release |
Contributor
|
Hi, @WillianAgostini! This PR has been published in v1.12.0 release. Thank you for your contribution ❤️! |
This was referenced Oct 27, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #5924
Now support reviver on parse the response