-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Chore/secure docs gen #525
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates primarily focus on enhancing documentation and ensuring compatibility with tools. A notable addition is a check for the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
size-limit report 📦
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #525 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.39% 96.39%
=======================================
Files 56 56
Lines 13179 13179
=======================================
Hits 12704 12704
Misses 475 475 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
ccamel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will help a lot. Just a minor remark. Thaks 🙏
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (5)
- Makefile.toml (1 hunks)
- docs/okp4-cognitarium.md (1 hunks)
- docs/okp4-dataverse.md (1 hunks)
- docs/okp4-law-stone.md (1 hunks)
- docs/okp4-objectarium.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
docs/okp4-law-stone.md (2)
137-137: The update of the hash value aligns with the PR objectives of ensuring documentation consistency. This change is approved.
134-137: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [5-137]
There are several grammatical and typographical issues identified throughout the document. While these are not directly related to the PR's scope, addressing them could improve the overall quality of the documentation. Consider reviewing and correcting these issues.
docs/okp4-dataverse.md (1)
241-241: The hash value in the rendered output metadata has been updated to6c4e48ca82d04a6a. This change likely reflects updates in the source data or its processing logic. Ensure that this new hash value accurately represents the current state of the source data and that any dependent systems or documentation that reference this hash are also updated accordingly.docs/okp4-objectarium.md (2)
511-514: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-7]
The introductory section provides a clear and concise overview of the smart contract's purpose and its integration with the Cosmos blockchains network and CosmWasm framework. The technical terms and URLs are correctly used, and the spelling mistakes flagged by the static analysis are false positives.
511-514: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [142-514]
The schema definitions and responses are comprehensive and provide detailed insights into the smart contract's data structures and expected responses. The spelling mistakes flagged by the static analysis are false positives related to technical terms and code snippets.
docs/okp4-cognitarium.md (1)
879-879: The document is well-structured and provides a comprehensive overview of the Cognitarium smart contract's capabilities and technical details. However, there are a few typographical errors and potential improvements that could enhance clarity and readability. For instance, ensuring consistent capitalization and addressing any spelling mistakes found by the grammar checking tool would be beneficial. Additionally, verifying the accuracy of technical details and ensuring they align with the latest version of the smart contract code is crucial for maintaining the documentation's reliability.
ccamel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 5.0.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Ensure deterministic docs generation by enforcing jq version
1.7.Also re-generate docs to make linters happy.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
jqin the build process.Documentation
okp4-cognitariumokp4-dataverseokp4-law-stoneokp4-objectarium