Skip to content

Conversation

@amimart
Copy link
Contributor

@amimart amimart commented Apr 2, 2024

Ensure deterministic docs generation by enforcing jq version 1.7.

Also re-generate docs to make linters happy.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Added a version check for jq in the build process.
  • Documentation

    • Updated hash values in the rendered documentation for:
      • okp4-cognitarium
      • okp4-dataverse
      • okp4-law-stone
      • okp4-objectarium

@amimart amimart requested a review from ccamel April 2, 2024 13:38
@amimart amimart self-assigned this Apr 2, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates primarily focus on enhancing documentation and ensuring compatibility with tools. A notable addition is a check for the jq version in the Makefile, ensuring necessary prerequisites for generating documentation. Changes in documentation files involve updates to hash values in rendered outputs, indicating adjustments in source data or its processing mechanisms.

Changes

Files Change Summary
Makefile.toml Added a check for the required version of jq before generating documentation.
docs/okp4-cognitarium.md
docs/okp4-dataverse.md
docs/okp4-law-stone.md
docs/okp4-objectarium.md
Updated hash values in rendered outputs, indicating changes in source data or processing.

🐰✨
In the realm of code, where changes brew,
A rabbit hopped, with updates anew.
Hashes change, as documents grow,
Ensuring knowledge, continues to flow.
With each leap, a discovery made,
In the garden of bytes, where data's laid.
🌟📜🐇

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@bot-anik
Copy link
Member

bot-anik commented Apr 2, 2024

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_objectarium.wasm 444.69 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_law_stone.wasm 648.68 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_cognitarium.wasm 835.63 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_dataverse.wasm 674.44 KB (0%)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.39%. Comparing base (c38088a) to head (aa7af99).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #525   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.39%   96.39%           
=======================================
  Files          56       56           
  Lines       13179    13179           
=======================================
  Hits        12704    12704           
  Misses        475      475           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will help a lot. Just a minor remark. Thaks 🙏

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c38088a and acaa0c1.
Files selected for processing (5)
  • Makefile.toml (1 hunks)
  • docs/okp4-cognitarium.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/okp4-dataverse.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/okp4-law-stone.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/okp4-objectarium.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
docs/okp4-law-stone.md (2)

137-137: The update of the hash value aligns with the PR objectives of ensuring documentation consistency. This change is approved.


134-137: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [5-137]

There are several grammatical and typographical issues identified throughout the document. While these are not directly related to the PR's scope, addressing them could improve the overall quality of the documentation. Consider reviewing and correcting these issues.

docs/okp4-dataverse.md (1)

241-241: The hash value in the rendered output metadata has been updated to 6c4e48ca82d04a6a. This change likely reflects updates in the source data or its processing logic. Ensure that this new hash value accurately represents the current state of the source data and that any dependent systems or documentation that reference this hash are also updated accordingly.

docs/okp4-objectarium.md (2)

511-514: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-7]

The introductory section provides a clear and concise overview of the smart contract's purpose and its integration with the Cosmos blockchains network and CosmWasm framework. The technical terms and URLs are correctly used, and the spelling mistakes flagged by the static analysis are false positives.


511-514: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [142-514]

The schema definitions and responses are comprehensive and provide detailed insights into the smart contract's data structures and expected responses. The spelling mistakes flagged by the static analysis are false positives related to technical terms and code snippets.

docs/okp4-cognitarium.md (1)

879-879: The document is well-structured and provides a comprehensive overview of the Cognitarium smart contract's capabilities and technical details. However, there are a few typographical errors and potential improvements that could enhance clarity and readability. For instance, ensuring consistent capitalization and addressing any spelling mistakes found by the grammar checking tool would be beneficial. Additionally, verifying the accuracy of technical details and ensuring they align with the latest version of the smart contract code is crucial for maintaining the documentation's reliability.

@amimart amimart requested a review from ccamel April 2, 2024 13:49
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between acaa0c1 and aa7af99.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • Makefile.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Makefile.toml

@amimart amimart merged commit e4e894e into main Apr 2, 2024
@amimart amimart deleted the chore/secure-docs-gen branch April 2, 2024 14:04
@bot-anik
Copy link
Member

bot-anik commented Apr 2, 2024

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.0.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants