Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unit Tests: utils and task #497

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Oct 22, 2018
Merged

Conversation

jamesmcclain
Copy link
Contributor

@jamesmcclain jamesmcclain commented Oct 15, 2018

Overview

Brief description of what this PR does, and why it is needed.

Checklist

  • Ran scripts/format_code and commited any changes
  • Documentation updated if needed
  • PR has a name that won't get you publicly shamed for vagueness

Notes

Optional. Ancillary topics, caveats, alternative strategies that didn't work out, anything else.

Testing Instructions

  • How to test this PR
  • Prefer bulleted description
  • Start after checking out this branch
  • Include any setup required, such as rebuilding the Docker image.
  • Include test case, and expected output if not captured by automated tests.

Closes #496
Closes #498
Depends on #490

@jamesmcclain jamesmcclain changed the title Backfill utils Unit Tests Backfill util(s|) Unit Tests Oct 15, 2018
@jamesmcclain jamesmcclain changed the title Backfill util(s|) Unit Tests Unit Tests: utils and task Oct 15, 2018
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #497 into develop will increase coverage by 0.82%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #497      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    66.02%   66.84%   +0.82%     
===========================================
  Files          174      155      -19     
  Lines         7331     6895     -436     
===========================================
- Hits          4840     4609     -231     
+ Misses        2491     2286     -205
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
rastervision/utils/files.py 89.47% <100%> (+18.04%) ⬆️
rastervision/filesystem/local_filesystem.py 97.75% <0%> (-1.13%) ⬇️
rastervision/runner/aws_batch_experiment_runner.py 16.66% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
rastervision/data/raster_source/__init__.py
rastervision/data/label_store/__init__.py
rastervision/utils/filter_geojson.py
rastervision/experiment/__init__.py
rastervision/task/object_detection.py
rastervision/backend/__init__.py
rastervision/__init__.py
... and 13 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3ebd69e...2384dc6. Read the comment docs.

James McClain added 6 commits October 17, 2018 15:40
`get_matching_s3_keys` fails when `suffix` is `None`.
Chip classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation are
better tested by integration tests.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant