Pact Installer, Md5 checksum not matching... #257

Closed
dlgoodchild opened this Issue Mar 24, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@dlgoodchild

There seems to be a problem with the md5 check for new packages. It's not obtaining a correct 32-char length md5 hash for the $digest value (I commented out the exit for now to move onward)....here's some sample output:

Installing python-setuptools
Found package python-setuptools
--2015-03-24 11:06:15--  http://mirrors.kernel.org/sourceware/cygwin//x86/release/python-setuptools/python-setuptools-0.6.34-1.tar.bz2
Resolving mirrors.kernel.org (mirrors.kernel.org)... 149.20.37.36, 198.145.20.143, 2001:4f8:4:6f:0:1994:3:14, ...
Connecting to mirrors.kernel.org (mirrors.kernel.org)|149.20.37.36|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 509812 (498K) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: ‘python-setuptools-0.6.34-1.tar.bz2’

100%[==========================================================>] 509,812      213KB/s   in 2.3s

2015-03-24 11:06:18 (213 KB/s) - ‘python-setuptools-0.6.34-1.tar.bz2’ saved [509812/509812]

MD5 sum did not match, exiting e7effad5438bf415f22b71f9d65a70f65141aea7a9820e1fd53fa551e7188463f81e634f4bb30f5c5a5be5c0ae91cabddff8e471daafe16f8ae44da864872ea9 not equal to 697ce133990ef908b20a3c8f1fbb9ff0
Unpacking...
Package python-setuptools requires the following packages, installing:
python
Package python is already installed, skipping
Package python-setuptools installed

As you can see I modified the echo to show both "md5"'s

@tombujok

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@tombujok

tombujok Mar 24, 2015

Contributor

Thanks, could you / somebody look into that? We are just baking the newest release - it would be great to include a fix for that too...

Contributor

tombujok commented Mar 24, 2015

Thanks, could you / somebody look into that? We are just baking the newest release - it would be great to include a fix for that too...

@rossdavidsmith

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rossdavidsmith

rossdavidsmith Mar 24, 2015

Contributor

The longer hash is a sha512 (replacing md5sum with sha512 seems to fix things).

Contributor

rossdavidsmith commented Mar 24, 2015

The longer hash is a sha512 (replacing md5sum with sha512 seems to fix things).

@tombujok

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@tombujok

tombujok Mar 24, 2015

Contributor

Pull request please 👍

Contributor

tombujok commented Mar 24, 2015

Pull request please 👍

@rossdavidsmith

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rossdavidsmith

rossdavidsmith Mar 24, 2015

Contributor

Submitted a pull request (#258).

It's my very first pull request, so apologies if I messed anything up!

Contributor

rossdavidsmith commented Mar 24, 2015

Submitted a pull request (#258).

It's my very first pull request, so apologies if I messed anything up!

@tombujok tombujok closed this in 71c761e Mar 25, 2015

@zeludo

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@zeludo

zeludo Mar 26, 2015

Could you please tell when the next release fixing this issue is planned ? Thx

zeludo commented Mar 26, 2015

Could you please tell when the next release fixing this issue is planned ? Thx

@harijoe

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@harijoe

harijoe Mar 26, 2015

+1 zeludo
or giving a way to compile babun from the sources, because at the moment the compiled version available on the website is the buggy one.

harijoe commented Mar 26, 2015

+1 zeludo
or giving a way to compile babun from the sources, because at the moment the compiled version available on the website is the buggy one.

@tombujok

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@tombujok

tombujok Mar 27, 2015

Contributor

We know about the problems - the final release candidate should be ready
today. New version should be out soon afterwards.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Julien Vallini notifications@github.com
wrote:

+1 zeludo
or giving a way to compile babun from the sources, because at the moment
the compiled version available on the website is the buggy one.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#257 (comment).

Contributor

tombujok commented Mar 27, 2015

We know about the problems - the final release candidate should be ready
today. New version should be out soon afterwards.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Julien Vallini notifications@github.com
wrote:

+1 zeludo
or giving a way to compile babun from the sources, because at the moment
the compiled version available on the website is the buggy one.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#257 (comment).

@tombujok

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@tombujok

tombujok Mar 31, 2015

Contributor

Fixed in 1.1.0.
Release status: #266

Contributor

tombujok commented Mar 31, 2015

Fixed in 1.1.0.
Release status: #266

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment