Fix %files section to not claim ownership of bindir and mandir #54

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 10, 2013

Conversation

Projects
None yet
1 participant
Contributor

jaredmorrow commented May 10, 2013

Addresses: #50 basho/riak_cs#554

The %files section had to general a case for both (s)bindir and mandir, specifying the actual directory rather than the contents of the directory. This change simply changes those
two lines to be the <dir>/* style as recommended in the fedora package maintainers documentation

Fix %files section to not claim ownership of bindir and mandir
Addresses: #50 basho/riak_cs#554

The %files section had to general a case for both (s)bindir
and mandir, specifying the actual directory rather than the
contents of the directory.  This change simply changes those
two lines to be the `<dir>/*` style as recommended in the
[fedora package maintainers documentation](http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25files_section)
Contributor

jaredmorrow commented May 10, 2013

Tested on centos 5 and fedora 17 by package installation and running it through rpmlint. This is the proper behavior.

jaredmorrow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2013

Merge pull request #54 from basho/jem-rpm-files-directive
Fix %files section to not claim ownership of bindir and mandir

@jaredmorrow jaredmorrow merged commit a9eed44 into master May 10, 2013

@jaredmorrow jaredmorrow deleted the jem-rpm-files-directive branch May 10, 2013

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment