Skip to content

Comparing changes

Choose two branches to see what’s changed or to start a new pull request. If you need to, you can also compare across forks.

Open a pull request

Create a new pull request by comparing changes across two branches. If you need to, you can also compare across forks.
...
Checking mergeability… Don’t worry, you can still create the pull request.
Commits on Jul 07, 2011
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Generalize the coverage behavior used to list keys and move much
of the coverage work into riak_core.

Fixes: az496

Add riak_core_coverage_filter, riak_core_coverage_fsm, and
riak_core_coverage_plan modules and add plumbing to
riak_core_vnode_master and riak_core_vnode to support
the coverage changes.
1d54403
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Fix code to pass filter function to vnodes. 7593a61
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin More work on generalization of the coverage code. a6ea475
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Allow coverage fsm to be used with or without a bucket parameter. 7c1e8fb
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Rearrange how coverage requests are distributed to vnodes to minimize…
… inter-node communications.
8f40175
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Have to check all vnodes on bucket listing because of variable n_vals. 07da951
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Fix some problems found while updating the key listing quickcheck test. 128c244
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Reorganize the coverage planning code. f4ebc82
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Update arity for test_link functions in riak_core_coverage_fsm. 162c4f0
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Housecleaning for the chash module. 9be33a9
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Add responsible_index/2 function to riak_core_ring as a way to get th…
…e ring index responsible for a {Bucket, Key} pair.
066696e
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Update spec for chash:next_index and fix wraparound bug. 1ddce80
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Housecleaning for riak_core_ring module. 6468dad
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Add quickcheck test for chash module. Currently on a property to test…
… the new next_index function.
491f6db
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Update riak_core_coverage_filter to use riak_core_ring:responsible_in…
…dex/2 instead of having to calculate the entire preflist.
c0ea95f
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Change coverage planning code to support covering multiple preflist v…
…nodes.
7128427
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Update some docs and specs and resolve some documentation TODOs 0eb74df
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Improve module edoc formatting for riak_core_coverage_fsm. e491d77
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Remove requirement for handle_coverage callback in riak_core_vnode. fde975e
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Change fail_on_warning to warnings_as_errors in rebar.config. 453d783
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Fix typo in header documentation. ff94f0f
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Fix typo in header docs of riak_core_coverage_filter. be627f7
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Wrap some long lines to column 80. 4164cf4
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin More wrapping of long lines. bc3da08
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Create ring_increment function in chash module to supplant use of ?RI…
…NGTOP div NumPartitions.
54b2ca7
Commits on Jul 08, 2011
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Update riak_core_ring:responsible_index to remove bucket and key awar…
…eness.
370ce6f
Commits on Jul 12, 2011
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Changes to remove bucket awareness from core coverage code and simplify
the processing of coverage requests.
13e9bdd
Commits on Jul 15, 2011
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Use sender tuple expected by riak_core_vnode:reply. 6bf1da3
Commits on Jul 18, 2011
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Do not use variable names in spec for riak_core_coverage_plan:create_…
…plan.
3b24871
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Change riak_core_coverage_fsm so that results are opaque structures a…
…nd the only requirement from the vnode is a {done, VNode} tuple when all results have been sent.
b1201d3
@kellymclaughlin kellymclaughlin Eliminate requirement for {done, VNode} tuple for coverage results fi…
…nalization.
1807da6