Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider allowing as_tibble() & others interchangeably with collect() #166

Closed
stephhazlitt opened this issue Jan 28, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Consider allowing as_tibble() & others interchangeably with collect() #166

stephhazlitt opened this issue Jan 28, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone
v0.2.0

Comments

@stephhazlitt
Copy link
Member

Consider allowing as_tibble() and similar to access results/object — in addition to existing collect() — with bcdc_query_geodata() ? This would be similar in design to dtplyr and dbplot behaviour.

This is the console message from dtplyr:

Use as.data.table()/as.data.frame()/as_tibble() to access results

In these cases as_tibble() all wrap collect() (I believe).
@stephhazlitt stephhazlitt changed the title Consider allowing as_tibble() & others interchangeably with connect() Consider allowing as_tibble() & others interchangeably with collect() Jan 28, 2020
@ateucher ateucher added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 28, 2020
@ateucher ateucher added this to the v0.2.0 milestone Jan 28, 2020
boshek added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2020
@boshek
provide as_tibble as an alternative to collect. Closes #166
6339f8d
@boshek boshek closed this as completed in 6f86247 Apr 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ateucher @stephhazlitt