Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review and revise design of Workbench #3

Open
bdolor opened this issue May 24, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@bdolor
Copy link
Collaborator

commented May 24, 2019

Conditions of Satisfaction

  • A team meeting is held to discuss the included MVP components of Workbench
  • A workbench MVP scope statement

In impromptu discussion with Brandon, Greg, Brad, it sounds like we're okay with MVP a static web page with links to other applications.

@pripley123

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Jun 20, 2019

A team meeting was held and requirements for a MVP mockup design were determined

@bdolor

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

commented Jun 21, 2019

if it's more efficient and since there isn't a tonne of work to sort through, perhaps @Jonesy could add a screenshot and we could work through look and feel issues asynchronously?

@bdolor bdolor added this to the Sprint 59 milestone Jun 21, 2019

@Jonesy

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Jun 24, 2019

Here is a mockup of version 1.0

image

@bdolor

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

commented Jun 24, 2019

I don't know if OCWA has a logo, but the question is there to be asked if establishing logos in this interface is something we want to commit to? Helpful from a quick visual recognition perspective, but also a precedent that I don't know we can always deliver on. Another question to consider is whether colour is to be used sparingly, for instance as an accent instead of a background. An argument could be made to establish a (colour) neutral content area since the number (and type) of items that workbench is intended to support is expected to grow and may not always be contained in a card.

@Jonesy

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Jul 5, 2019

Here is a revision with some placeholder icons to demonstrate easier scan-ability. I think the Discussion can just be simple chat bubbles, and for OCWA I was thinking something like a flow with a magnifying glass checking the flow in some way.

screencapture-localhost-8000-2019-07-05-09_13_04

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.