Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion: BIDS-RAW specification --> Sharing of template data ... yes/no? #318

Open
sappelhoff opened this issue Aug 23, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@sappelhoff
Copy link
Collaborator

@sappelhoff sappelhoff commented Aug 23, 2019

In the context of EEG data, we (@robertoostenveld, @jasmainak et al.) stumbled over the following issue that has implications for the whole BIDS specification:

When sharing electrode positions it is possible, to share "template" data, such as idealized positions on a sphere. These data are not measured together with the raw data, but are instead computed ... or just taken over from the manufacturer's report on the product.

Currently in our specification we do not explicitly discourage or encourage the inclusion of template data in a BIDS RAW dataset (such as an electrodes.tsv file that is not based on true data)

Should we include clarifying statements that template data SHOULD NOT be shared?


If we do not make this point, then we agree to buy into the following drawbacks (maybe more):

  • users might think the template data is true, measured data
  • we are distributing one and the same template again and again (duplication, clutter)

References

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
1 participant
You can’t perform that action at this time.