Should FASTQ output use reads' "original qualities"? #436

Closed
ryan-williams opened this Issue Oct 26, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@ryan-williams
Member

ryan-williams commented Oct 26, 2014

AlignmentRecordConverter.convertToFastq currently outputs getQual as the FASTQ qualities; should it instead output getOrigQual? I'm not super familiar with the difference between read qualities and "original qualities" but I am having a hard time imagining that "original qualities" would not be the thing that was originally found in the FASTQ data the reads originated from.

I have this change ready, lmk if it seems reasonable.

@fnothaft

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fnothaft

fnothaft Mar 25, 2016

Member

I think this was resolved by 322c32f.

Member

fnothaft commented Mar 25, 2016

I think this was resolved by 322c32f.

@fnothaft fnothaft closed this Mar 25, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment