Explicitly validate user args passed to transform #841

Closed
fnothaft opened this Issue Oct 2, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@fnothaft
Member

fnothaft commented Oct 2, 2015

Comes out of discussion on #831 and ryan-williams#1. With the "Swiss Army Knife" nature of transform, there are a fair number of possibly conflicting ways that arguments can be passed. We should more explicitly validate the arguments passed.

@heuermh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@heuermh

heuermh Jul 21, 2016

Member

Was this addressed in #1081?

Member

heuermh commented Jul 21, 2016

Was this addressed in #1081?

@fnothaft

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fnothaft

fnothaft Jul 21, 2016

Member

No, it wasn't.

Member

fnothaft commented Jul 21, 2016

No, it wasn't.

@fnothaft fnothaft added the wontfix label Mar 3, 2017

@fnothaft

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fnothaft

fnothaft Mar 3, 2017

Member

Closing as won't fix.

Member

fnothaft commented Mar 3, 2017

Closing as won't fix.

@fnothaft fnothaft closed this Mar 3, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment