New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor SequenceDictionary to use Contig instead of SequenceRecord #997

heuermh opened this Issue Apr 12, 2016 · 1 comment


2 participants

heuermh commented Apr 12, 2016

In discussion with @tdanford around RDD[Feature]s we thought it might be worthwhile to refactor SequenceDictionary to use Contig from bdg-formats instead of SequenceRecord.

I also suggested renaming Contig to Reference and adding a new schema class ReferenceSet, per GA4GH ( and, respectively). I'm not suggesting using those schema classes wholesale, just the names. I'm not that keen on the name ReferenceSet either, but calling it Assembly was problematic.

@fnothaft fnothaft added this to the 0.21.0 milestone Jul 20, 2016

@heuermh heuermh modified the milestones: 0.21.0, 0.22.0 Oct 13, 2016


This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment

fnothaft Mar 2, 2017


Closing this, as bigdatagenomics/bdg-formats#43 seems like a better solution.


fnothaft commented Mar 2, 2017

Closing this, as bigdatagenomics/bdg-formats#43 seems like a better solution.

@fnothaft fnothaft closed this Mar 2, 2017

@heuermh heuermh added this to Completed in Release 0.23.0 Mar 8, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment