New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ADAM-1221] Bump Spark/Hadoop versions. #1258

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 10, 2016

Conversation

Projects
3 participants
@fnothaft
Member

fnothaft commented Nov 10, 2016

Reverts #1254, then reapplies commit but while fixing sed replacement line.

@fnothaft fnothaft added this to the 0.21.0 milestone Nov 10, 2016

@fnothaft

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fnothaft

fnothaft Nov 10, 2016

Member

This is still wrong!

Member

fnothaft commented Nov 10, 2016

This is still wrong!

@AmplabJenkins

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@AmplabJenkins

AmplabJenkins Nov 10, 2016

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/1584/

Build result: FAILURE

[...truncated 38 lines...]Triggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.3.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.4.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,2.0.0,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.4.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.6.1,centosADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.5.2,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.5.2,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,2.0.0,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,2.0.0,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,2.0.0,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,2.0.0,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSNotifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'
Test FAILed.

AmplabJenkins commented Nov 10, 2016

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/1584/

Build result: FAILURE

[...truncated 38 lines...]Triggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.3.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.4.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,2.0.0,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.4.1,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.6.1,centosADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.5.2,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.5.2,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,2.0.0,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,2.0.0,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.10,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,2.0.0,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.3.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.11,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,2.0.0,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,2.10,1.4.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.0,2.11,1.6.1,centos completed with result SUCCESSNotifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'
Test FAILed.

@AmplabJenkins

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@AmplabJenkins

AmplabJenkins Nov 10, 2016

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/1585/
Test PASSed.

AmplabJenkins commented Nov 10, 2016

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/1585/
Test PASSed.

substitution_cmd="s/_$svp/-spark2_$svp/g"
find . -name "pom.xml" -exec sed \
-e "/utils-/ s/_2\.10/-spark2_2.10/g" \
-e "/adam-/ s/_2\.10/-spark2_2.10/g" \

This comment has been minimized.

@heuermh

heuermh Nov 10, 2016

Member

Does this mean we're missing ${scala.version.prefix} somewhere, or are we intentionally not using it somewhere, in artifactId perhaps?

@heuermh

heuermh Nov 10, 2016

Member

Does this mean we're missing ${scala.version.prefix} somewhere, or are we intentionally not using it somewhere, in artifactId perhaps?

This comment has been minimized.

@fnothaft

fnothaft Nov 10, 2016

Member

That line of thought was what led me to delete it originally. However, yeah, we're intentionally not using SVP in the artifact names. That is what #1254 broke. This looks to be passing but I'd like to go over the CI logs before we merge.

@fnothaft

fnothaft Nov 10, 2016

Member

That line of thought was what led me to delete it originally. However, yeah, we're intentionally not using SVP in the artifact names. That is what #1254 broke. This looks to be passing but I'd like to go over the CI logs before we merge.

@heuermh heuermh merged commit 1b72f0b into bigdatagenomics:master Nov 10, 2016

1 check passed

default Merged build finished.
Details
@heuermh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@heuermh

heuermh Nov 10, 2016

Member

Thank you, @fnothaft!

Member

heuermh commented Nov 10, 2016

Thank you, @fnothaft!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment