New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ADAM-1361] Fix misnamed ADAM überjar. #1546

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 25, 2017

Conversation

Projects
4 participants
@fnothaft
Member

fnothaft commented May 24, 2017

Resolves #1361.

@fnothaft fnothaft added this to the 0.23.0 milestone May 24, 2017

@fnothaft fnothaft requested a review from heuermh May 24, 2017

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coveralls

coveralls May 24, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 82.041% when pulling 884ba69 on fnothaft:issues/1361-spark2-artifact into 2820e94 on bigdatagenomics:master.

coveralls commented May 24, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 82.041% when pulling 884ba69 on fnothaft:issues/1361-spark2-artifact into 2820e94 on bigdatagenomics:master.

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coveralls

coveralls May 24, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 81.93% when pulling 884ba69 on fnothaft:issues/1361-spark2-artifact into 2820e94 on bigdatagenomics:master.

coveralls commented May 24, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 81.93% when pulling 884ba69 on fnothaft:issues/1361-spark2-artifact into 2820e94 on bigdatagenomics:master.

@AmplabJenkins

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@AmplabJenkins

AmplabJenkins May 24, 2017

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/2050/
Test PASSed.

AmplabJenkins commented May 24, 2017

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/2050/
Test PASSed.

@heuermh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@heuermh

heuermh May 24, 2017

Member

With this

diff --git a/scripts/move_to_spark_2.sh b/scripts/move_to_spark_2.sh
index ebd9fd89..3e83ebdd 100755
--- a/scripts/move_to_spark_2.sh
+++ b/scripts/move_to_spark_2.sh
@@ -19,5 +19,6 @@ find . -name "pom.xml" -exec sed \
     -e "/adam-/ s/_2\.1/-spark2_2.1/g" \
     -e "/utils-/ $substitution_cmd" \
     -e "/adam-/ $substitution_cmd" \
+    -e "/adam_/ $substitution_cmd" \
     -e "/spark.version/ s/1.6.3/2.1.0/g" \
     -i.spark2.bak '{}' \;

the <finalName> element can stay as is. This PR adds -assembly to the assembly artifact names.

Member

heuermh commented May 24, 2017

With this

diff --git a/scripts/move_to_spark_2.sh b/scripts/move_to_spark_2.sh
index ebd9fd89..3e83ebdd 100755
--- a/scripts/move_to_spark_2.sh
+++ b/scripts/move_to_spark_2.sh
@@ -19,5 +19,6 @@ find . -name "pom.xml" -exec sed \
     -e "/adam-/ s/_2\.1/-spark2_2.1/g" \
     -e "/utils-/ $substitution_cmd" \
     -e "/adam-/ $substitution_cmd" \
+    -e "/adam_/ $substitution_cmd" \
     -e "/spark.version/ s/1.6.3/2.1.0/g" \
     -i.spark2.bak '{}' \;

the <finalName> element can stay as is. This PR adds -assembly to the assembly artifact names.

@fnothaft

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@fnothaft

fnothaft May 24, 2017

Member

@heuermh Since the assembly jars are largely handled programmatically from the ./bin/adam-* scripts, I don't really see a benefit to changing the JAR name with <finalName>. I'd rather eliminate <finalName> and have one fewer place where things can go wrong in the move_to scripts.

Member

fnothaft commented May 24, 2017

@heuermh Since the assembly jars are largely handled programmatically from the ./bin/adam-* scripts, I don't really see a benefit to changing the JAR name with <finalName>. I'd rather eliminate <finalName> and have one fewer place where things can go wrong in the move_to scripts.

@heuermh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@heuermh

heuermh May 25, 2017

Member

I don't feel strongly either way.

Member

heuermh commented May 25, 2017

I don't feel strongly either way.

@heuermh heuermh merged commit 3ea4f18 into bigdatagenomics:master May 25, 2017

3 checks passed

codacy/pr Good work! A positive pull request.
Details
coverage/coveralls Coverage remained the same at 82.041%
Details
default Merged build finished.
Details
@heuermh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@heuermh

heuermh May 25, 2017

Member

Thank you, @fnothaft

Member

heuermh commented May 25, 2017

Thank you, @fnothaft

@heuermh heuermh added this to Completed in Release 0.23.0 May 30, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment