Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ADAM-1673] Don't set PL to empty when no PL is attached to a gVCF record #1674

merged 1 commit into from Aug 18, 2017


Copy link

@fnothaft fnothaft commented Aug 18, 2017

Resolves #1763.

@fnothaft fnothaft added this to the 0.23.0 milestone Aug 18, 2017
Copy link

@coveralls coveralls commented Aug 18, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.05%) to 83.403% when pulling 003a1fe on fnothaft:issues/1673-empty-pl into 6c8f8d7 on bigdatagenomics:master.

Copy link

@AmplabJenkins AmplabJenkins commented Aug 18, 2017

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Test PASSed.

@heuermh heuermh merged commit b46b583 into bigdatagenomics:master Aug 18, 2017
3 checks passed
3 checks passed
codacy/pr Good work! A positive pull request.
coverage/coveralls Coverage decreased (-0.05%) to 83.403%
default Merged build finished.
Copy link

@heuermh heuermh commented Aug 18, 2017

Thank you, @fnothaft

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.