Skip to content

Conversation

@thisyahlen-deriv
Copy link
Contributor

@thisyahlen-deriv thisyahlen-deriv commented Sep 15, 2023

Changes:

Please provide a summary of the change.

Screenshots:

Please provide some screenshots of the change.
Screenshot 2023-09-15 at 3 23 30 PM

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 15, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
deriv-app ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 18, 2023 3:06am

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 15, 2023

A production App ID was automatically generated for this PR. (log)

Click here to copy & paste above information.
- **PR**: [https://github.com/binary-com/deriv-app/pull/10092](https://github.com/binary-com/deriv-app/pull/10092)
- **URLs**:
    - **w/ App ID + Server**: https://deriv-app-git-fork-thisyahlen-deriv-thisyahlen-addcfdsec-3aaa58.binary.sx?qa_server=red.binaryws.com&app_id=36517
    - **Original**: https://deriv-app-git-fork-thisyahlen-deriv-thisyahlen-addcfdsec-3aaa58.binary.sx
- **App ID**: `36517`

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 15, 2023

🚨 Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:

Category Score
🔺 Performance 21
🟧 Accessibility 75
🟢 Best practices 92
🟧 SEO 85
🟢 PWA 90

Lighthouse ran with https://deriv-app-git-fork-thisyahlen-deriv-thisyahlen-addcfdsec-3aaa58.binary.sx/

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 15, 2023

Coverage Status

coverage: 10.095% (-0.006%) from 10.101% when pulling 71b309d on thisyahlen-deriv:thisyahlen/add_cfd_section_to_wallets into 3fe4a5c on binary-com:master.

},
];

const OtherCFDPlatformsList: React.FC = () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const OtherCFDPlatformsList: React.FC = () => {
const NonMT5CFDPlatformsList: React.FC = () => {

How about this? 🤔

type TProps = {
description: string;
icon: ReactElement;
icon: React.ReactNode;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So we go with React.ReactNode instead of ReactElement? just wanna clarify the standard

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better to go with reactNode cause its more flexible in terms of children and it doesnt get executed if the function is not fired

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug C 6 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

idea Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension sonarlint SonarLint

@yashim-deriv yashim-deriv merged commit 23eac70 into deriv-com:master Sep 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants