Docs update #76
Docs update #76
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #76 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.27% 82.09% -0.18%
==========================================
Files 37 37
Lines 897 905 +8
Branches 108 110 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 738 743 +5
- Misses 159 162 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
So, I think I have covered all the topics that we discussed regarding the docs. Just have that example with the multiple-inputs in the two-mappers pipeline that maybe can be removed from this PR. What do you think about it @thejmazz ? I made a disclaimer on the script anyway... |
|
Hmm just noticed that |
| >``` | ||
| > This will end up in three different branches (or lineages) with three | ||
| >leaves: | ||
| > `task0 --> task1 --> task4`, `task0 --> task2 --> task4` and `task0 --> |
thejmazz
Aug 25, 2017
Member
name these forked tasks task2A, task2B, task2C
(to be consistent with idea that fork is for multiple "alternatives" to a specific task (e.g. different params)
rather than different tasks
name these forked tasks task2A, task2B, task2C
(to be consistent with idea that fork is for multiple "alternatives" to a specific task (e.g. different params)
rather than different tasks
tiagofilipe12
Aug 25, 2017
Author
Member
👍
| join(task2, task3, fork(task4, task5)) | ||
| ), | ||
| task6 | ||
| ) |
thejmazz
Aug 25, 2017
Member
add labeled diagram (not the d3 screenshot) for this pipeline
add labeled diagram (not the d3 screenshot) for this pipeline
This PR intends to improve current bionode-watermill documentation.