Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ES6 Discussion #33

thejmazz opened this issue Mar 19, 2016 · 0 comments

ES6 Discussion #33

thejmazz opened this issue Mar 19, 2016 · 0 comments


Copy link

Continuing from bionode/bionode-fasta#6


  • backwards compatibility as much as possible (maybe legacy v0.12.x)
  • help engage new members by not being super bleeding edge
  • never require transpilation of Node code
  • browser code will need to be bundled anyways, so transpilation can be OK for that? (i.e. browserify with -t babelify, or webpack + babel-loader) working examples for browser setup of a module should always be included.
  • follow best streams implementation (probably latest, may be reason to break backwards compatibility, but with major bump as per semver)

ES6 Compatibility Table

ES6 use cases, arguments for, examples in bionode:

  • todo...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

No branches or pull requests

2 participants