Implement content negotiation for resources, registries, and collections#682
Merged
Conversation
Codecov ReportBase: 39.28% // Head: 39.40% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #682 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 39.28% 39.40% +0.12%
==========================================
Files 129 129
Lines 7265 7298 +33
Branches 1654 1663 +9
==========================================
+ Hits 2854 2876 +22
- Misses 4240 4249 +9
- Partials 171 173 +2
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds content negotiation to the UI pages for resources (e.g., GO), registries (e.g., BARTOC), and collections. It's enable to serve JSON and YAML direct dumps of the internal Pydantic models OR the RDF flavor. I'm guessing I will find that the FAIR Evaluator expects some more specific things from the RDF, which we can update next.
CC @micheldumontier @vemonet