Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unused secp256k1_fe_inv_all_var #878

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 25, 2021

Conversation

sipa
Copy link
Contributor

@sipa sipa commented Jan 24, 2021

This function is only used in tests, since its functionality was inlined into secp256k1_ge_set_all_gej_var in #553.

Closes #873.

@gmaxwell
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

@practicalswift
Copy link
Contributor

cr ACK 75d2ae1: patch looks correct

@real-or-random
Copy link
Contributor

real-or-random commented Jan 24, 2021

utACK 75d2ae1

@practicalswift What's a "cr ACK"?
ah "code review"?

Copy link
Contributor

@jonasnick jonasnick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 75d2ae1

@jonasnick jonasnick merged commit db72678 into bitcoin-core:master Jan 25, 2021
Fabcien pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2021
Summary:
```
This function is only used in tests, since its functionality was inlined
into secp256k1_ge_set_all_gej_var in #553.
```

Backport of [[bitcoin-core/secp256k1#878 | secp256k1#878]]

Test Plan:
  ninja check-secp256k1

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, deadalnix

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, deadalnix

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D9384
deadalnix pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/secp256k1 that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2021
Summary:
```
This function is only used in tests, since its functionality was inlined
into secp256k1_ge_set_all_gej_var in #553.
```

Backport of [[bitcoin-core/secp256k1#878 | secp256k1#878]]

Test Plan:
  ninja check-secp256k1

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, deadalnix

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, deadalnix

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D9384
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

UB in tests: Invalid pointer comparison in secp256k1_fe_inv_all_var
5 participants