Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add BrowserStack to the Contributors section #1089

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 19, 2015

Conversation

Projects
None yet
5 participants
Contributor

saivann commented Oct 15, 2015

@mateuszrybin suggested we could use BrowserStack for testing the site on several devices and suggested they were offering the service free of charge to open-source projects.

After a quick email with them, they are indeed happy about providing the service in exchange for a backlink in our "About us" page. This pull request is submitting that link for review (see screenshot below).

I personally think this is a very useful tool to have, and what we're asked to provide in exchange seems very reasonable to me.

capture du 2015-10-15 02 51 52

@saivann saivann referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2015

Closed

Redesign Idea #1078

Contributor

carnesen commented Oct 15, 2015

It's a bit much to put BrowserStack alongside Bitcoin Foundation in the sponsorship section like that. It makes it seem like they've donated thousands of dollars for site hosting whereas they actually just provide their not-that-expensive service for free to open-source projects. GitHub and Travis CI do that too without such a string attached. How about instead we add a "Technology" section along the lines of "This site is built using .... It uses GitHub for version control, Travis CI for continuous integration, BrowserStack for browser testing.... The live site is hosted on ...." ?

Contributor

harding commented Oct 15, 2015

I was thinking along similar lines to @carnesen; it does seem unfair to the Bitcoin Foundation to equate their level of support to what BrowserStack is offering. I like the idea of a Technology section or maybe a Service Contributors section or something.

I agree w/ @carnesen. They're not happy with just badge/project links in PRs on github like travis/etc?

On Oct 15, 2015, at 06:23, David A. Harding notifications@github.com wrote:

I was thinking along similar lines to @carnesen; it does seem unfair to the Bitcoin Foundation to equate their level of support to what BrowserStack is offering. I like the idea of a Technology section or maybe a Service Contributors section or something.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Contributor

saivann commented Oct 15, 2015

Ah, thank you for suggesting this! I had the same feeling, but was just too tired to find any real solution yesterday. I've added a "Service contributors" subsection with the few service providers that offer us free ads-free services (screenshot below). I think we could also potentially put service providers who would be offering us any reasonable rebates for being listed on this list.

capture du 2015-10-15 12 16 56

Contributor

carnesen commented Oct 15, 2015

Travis is failing ("ID sponsorship already defined"), but otherwise looks good to me.

Contributor

wbnns commented Oct 15, 2015

@saivann nice job, LGTM.

Contributor

harding commented Oct 15, 2015

LGTM too. Thanks!

Contributor

saivann commented Oct 16, 2015

In the absence of critical feedback, this pull request will be merged on October 17th

@saivann saivann merged commit 342b17f into master Oct 19, 2015

2 checks passed

continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build passed
Details

@saivann saivann deleted the browserstack-contributors branch Oct 19, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment