New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "Capacity increases" page with initial signatures #1165

Merged
merged 15 commits into from Dec 21, 2015

Conversation

Projects
None yet
@harding
Contributor

harding commented Dec 20, 2015

2015-12-21-145148_652x151_scrot

Link: Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system

If you're a known contributor and want to add your signature, please make a comment saying "ACK statement" and I will add your name as provided on your GitHub profile.

@maaku

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@maaku

maaku Dec 20, 2015

ACK statement

maaku commented Dec 20, 2015

ACK statement

@TheBlueMatt

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt Dec 20, 2015

Contributor

ACK Statement.

Contributor

TheBlueMatt commented Dec 20, 2015

ACK Statement.

@adam3us

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@adam3us

adam3us Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

adam3us commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

@CodeShark

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@CodeShark

CodeShark Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement

Contributor

CodeShark commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

@btcdrak

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@btcdrak

btcdrak Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement

Contributor

btcdrak commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

@maaku

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@maaku

maaku Dec 21, 2015

Note if you want your name added to the list, use "ACK statement"

maaku commented Dec 21, 2015

Note if you want your name added to the list, use "ACK statement"

@jonasschnelli

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jonasschnelli

jonasschnelli Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement

Contributor

jonasschnelli commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

@laanwj

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@laanwj

laanwj Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement, this is duly needed.

Contributor

laanwj commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement, this is duly needed.

@kanzure

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kanzure

kanzure Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement

Contributor

kanzure commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

@greenaddress

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@greenaddress

greenaddress Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement

disclaimer: we intend to use/support SW; not sure if the ACK is only valid for 'core' contributors or for any contributor in the space but there you have it.

Contributor

greenaddress commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

disclaimer: we intend to use/support SW; not sure if the ACK is only valid for 'core' contributors or for any contributor in the space but there you have it.

@harding

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@harding

harding Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

Statement has been revised by request to remind readers that work on scalability has been on going. I have not moved any signatures from the old version to the new version, so @maaku will need to post again if they want to add his signature. Sorry for the inconvenience.

2015-12-21-145148_652x151_scrot

Contributor

harding commented Dec 21, 2015

Statement has been revised by request to remind readers that work on scalability has been on going. I have not moved any signatures from the old version to the new version, so @maaku will need to post again if they want to add his signature. Sorry for the inconvenience.

2015-12-21-145148_652x151_scrot

@greenaddress

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@greenaddress

greenaddress Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement

Contributor

greenaddress commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

@instagibbs

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@instagibbs

instagibbs Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement

Contributor

instagibbs commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

@laanwj

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@laanwj

laanwj Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

re-ACK statemenet

Contributor

laanwj commented Dec 21, 2015

re-ACK statemenet

@kanzure

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@kanzure

kanzure Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

re-ACK statement

Contributor

kanzure commented Dec 21, 2015

re-ACK statement

@jonasschnelli

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jonasschnelli

jonasschnelli Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

re-ACK statement

Contributor

jonasschnelli commented Dec 21, 2015

re-ACK statement

@btcdrak

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@btcdrak

btcdrak Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

re-ACK statement

Contributor

btcdrak commented Dec 21, 2015

re-ACK statement

@sipa

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sipa

sipa Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

re-ACK

Contributor

sipa commented Dec 21, 2015

re-ACK

@morcos

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@morcos

morcos Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

morcos commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

@CodeShark

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@CodeShark

CodeShark Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

re-ACK statement

Contributor

CodeShark commented Dec 21, 2015

re-ACK statement

@coblee

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coblee

coblee Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

coblee commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

@paveljanik

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@paveljanik

paveljanik Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

paveljanik commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

@theymos

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@theymos

theymos Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement

Contributor

theymos commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement

@afk11

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@afk11

afk11 Dec 21, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement.

Contributor

afk11 commented Dec 21, 2015

ACK statement.

@FinalHash

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@FinalHash

FinalHash Dec 22, 2015

UnACK statement -- Marshall Long of FinalHash
Now i think this is a bad idea. Edited: jan.5 2015

FinalHash commented Dec 22, 2015

UnACK statement -- Marshall Long of FinalHash
Now i think this is a bad idea. Edited: jan.5 2015

@MarcoFalke

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@MarcoFalke

MarcoFalke Dec 22, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement

Contributor

MarcoFalke commented Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement

@obi

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@obi

obi Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement - As a UK based bitcoin exchange, Coinfloor feels that the direction outlined in the original statement is in the best interests of Bitcoin and the Bitcoin community in the short, medium and long run.

Although not core contributors, we think it is important to show that there are bitcoin exchanges that are happy to use and support Segregated Witness, Lightning Network, etc.

obi commented Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement - As a UK based bitcoin exchange, Coinfloor feels that the direction outlined in the original statement is in the best interests of Bitcoin and the Bitcoin community in the short, medium and long run.

Although not core contributors, we think it is important to show that there are bitcoin exchanges that are happy to use and support Segregated Witness, Lightning Network, etc.

@dexX7

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dexX7

dexX7 Dec 22, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement

(Infrequent contributor to Bitcoin Core, contributor to Mastercoin/Omni -- this ACK is on behalf of myself.)

Contributor

dexX7 commented Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement

(Infrequent contributor to Bitcoin Core, contributor to Mastercoin/Omni -- this ACK is on behalf of myself.)

@ghtdak

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ghtdak

ghtdak Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement

ghtdak commented Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement

@harding

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@harding

harding Dec 22, 2015

Contributor

Note: if you speak for an organization or product (such as a miner or wallet), you may add that into your ACK (or edit your existing ACK). We will assume by default that you are ACKing only on behalf of yourself.

Contributor

harding commented Dec 22, 2015

Note: if you speak for an organization or product (such as a miner or wallet), you may add that into your ACK (or edit your existing ACK). We will assume by default that you are ACKing only on behalf of yourself.

@Kixunil

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Kixunil

Kixunil Dec 22, 2015

Not contributor but I like segwit and other ideas seem reasonable to me too. Keep up good work and thank you!

Kixunil commented Dec 22, 2015

Not contributor but I like segwit and other ideas seem reasonable to me too. Keep up good work and thank you!

@arowser

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@arowser

arowser Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement

arowser commented Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement

@flix1

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@flix1

flix1 Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement

flix1 commented Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement

@maraoz

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@maraoz

maraoz Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement

maraoz commented Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement

@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ghost

ghost Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement on behalf of Bitcoinpaygate

ghost commented Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement on behalf of Bitcoinpaygate

@voisine

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@voisine

voisine Dec 22, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement on behalf of breadwallet

(We intend to implement segwit to launch simultaneously with the roll out. I'd also like to put emphasis on "but they [hard-fork max block size increases] will be critically important long term", from the statement. We must be extremely conservative and keep the network functioning as it has been, with fees incentivized through prevailing relay policy and miner tx selection policy, not hard blocksize limits.)

Contributor

voisine commented Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement on behalf of breadwallet

(We intend to implement segwit to launch simultaneously with the roll out. I'd also like to put emphasis on "but they [hard-fork max block size increases] will be critically important long term", from the statement. We must be extremely conservative and keep the network functioning as it has been, with fees incentivized through prevailing relay policy and miner tx selection policy, not hard blocksize limits.)

@rubensayshi

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rubensayshi

rubensayshi Dec 22, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement on behalf of Blocktrail

Contributor

rubensayshi commented Dec 22, 2015

ACK statement on behalf of Blocktrail

@NicolasDorier

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@NicolasDorier

NicolasDorier Dec 23, 2015

Contributor

NBitcoin will be updated as soon as segwit is merged, so .NET bitcoin software will be able to enjoy it very quickly.

Contributor

NicolasDorier commented Dec 23, 2015

NBitcoin will be updated as soon as segwit is merged, so .NET bitcoin software will be able to enjoy it very quickly.

@raulyaoyuan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@raulyaoyuan

raulyaoyuan Dec 23, 2015

ACK statement

raulyaoyuan commented Dec 23, 2015

ACK statement

@bip32JP

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bip32JP

bip32JP Dec 23, 2015

ACK statement on behalf bitbank Inc.
https://bitcoinbank.co.jp/
(Wallet, exchange, and crypto-news outlet based in Tokyo, JP)

Writing up Japanese translation right now.

bip32JP commented Dec 23, 2015

ACK statement on behalf bitbank Inc.
https://bitcoinbank.co.jp/
(Wallet, exchange, and crypto-news outlet based in Tokyo, JP)

Writing up Japanese translation right now.

@SuperHanZi

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@SuperHanZi

SuperHanZi Dec 25, 2015

ACK Statement, by ZhangLian.info

SuperHanZi commented Dec 25, 2015

ACK Statement, by ZhangLian.info

@gabridome

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@gabridome

gabridome Dec 25, 2015

Contributor

ACK statement

Contributor

gabridome commented Dec 25, 2015

ACK statement

@raulyaoyuan

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@raulyaoyuan

raulyaoyuan Dec 29, 2015

ACK statement on behalf bw.com.

raulyaoyuan commented Dec 29, 2015

ACK statement on behalf bw.com.

@aawilliams

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@aawilliams

aawilliams Dec 30, 2015

ACK statement

aawilliams commented Dec 30, 2015

ACK statement

@ABISprotocol

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@ABISprotocol

ABISprotocol Dec 31, 2015

I'm keeping an open mind so have declined to sign on to statements as much could occur in the near future.

ABISprotocol commented Dec 31, 2015

I'm keeping an open mind so have declined to sign on to statements as much could occur in the near future.

@petertodd

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@petertodd

petertodd Dec 31, 2015

Contributor

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

ACK statement re: Gregory Maxwell's "Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system"
post on bitcoin-dev, Dec 7th 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=CoCP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Contributor

petertodd commented Dec 31, 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

ACK statement re: Gregory Maxwell's "Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system"
post on bitcoin-dev, Dec 7th 2015

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQGrBAEBCACVBQJWhb49XhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw
MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwODE5YTE0NGYyNmZhOGVlNjQ0OTMyYWNhZmFkMGZmYzUw
NDY5NDRkN2ZjNzY4MWIvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0
ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQwIXyHOf0udwEtwf9EhT2qYLyudj3MAi8jZKlQzMQ
fgfk83Sswm/PbvjWLJWFlWDCPbacv3hyPjMV/qwkpz4N/4Pnw9WhtSO74MR9DWl0
SsD4KILvC6zXSrHG2wbOhwtZ4TSyoA+eT/6PT9/WWpWq6aSllSdP80bFVzEWKmJa
E4u/H/X4Ogqxvm6IfkUl5m7SZe/6gD5Z2whSCFGovtePlbUzMDfWOTFt1zLQbyyr
5YTlk4fv6RpRMCKSVWQK4zf6XGntu+NDM4c/+dS+IUOmtBlbJunDN99nTVEnSrgP
ICfB/ujoK5U732II7YObnar7QIUVaYInsbwB7qHAZYxSa2DTEzn1YGD7XcScmA==
=CoCP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

@AvatarX001

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@AvatarX001

AvatarX001 Jan 1, 2016

ACK statement

AvatarX001 commented Jan 1, 2016

ACK statement

@evoskuil

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@evoskuil

evoskuil Jan 1, 2016

Contributor

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

ACK statement

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011865.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWkYSyAAoJEDzYwH8LXOFOWXMH+waxYK2U/teWOMOH4dPrh2ED
hoSMqBZYb9jTfENsAJSc9s7bLySg9Fd43d/s1WrtDGoNgT4n/Y0vj1V082TqrA5O
lbihE4XPNs3XQ13THR8sqsmSbfDaPUSar3TgwT36BMRUHEhDTti0n1hjAJD2XNbH
OuizhXcZDpjyfmJbh0ZjK4evjc8fFsGjmIznTO4whqJfvPmF1PoU9bRLCtheht2r
45FDLSbk7u2dGJb5edK+EaW2z9bI6ghciMzoLmGq0g8dg4zX10HTiWhyjitDjWi+
weSWpg7SpM2AJLiRCjpojcp7l+2GrfxBc56p+TPy3T2yb8lTZ7ob5douWDUUE7g=
=ii4a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Contributor

evoskuil commented Jan 1, 2016

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

ACK statement

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011865.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWkYSyAAoJEDzYwH8LXOFOWXMH+waxYK2U/teWOMOH4dPrh2ED
hoSMqBZYb9jTfENsAJSc9s7bLySg9Fd43d/s1WrtDGoNgT4n/Y0vj1V082TqrA5O
lbihE4XPNs3XQ13THR8sqsmSbfDaPUSar3TgwT36BMRUHEhDTti0n1hjAJD2XNbH
OuizhXcZDpjyfmJbh0ZjK4evjc8fFsGjmIznTO4whqJfvPmF1PoU9bRLCtheht2r
45FDLSbk7u2dGJb5edK+EaW2z9bI6ghciMzoLmGq0g8dg4zX10HTiWhyjitDjWi+
weSWpg7SpM2AJLiRCjpojcp7l+2GrfxBc56p+TPy3T2yb8lTZ7ob5douWDUUE7g=
=ii4a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

@narula narula referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2016

Closed

ACKs on the site? #19

@vxst

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@vxst

vxst Jan 17, 2016

ACK statement

PS. not a contributor, just a Bitcoin user. Developing some product related to Bitcoin.

vxst commented Jan 17, 2016

ACK statement

PS. not a contributor, just a Bitcoin user. Developing some product related to Bitcoin.

@rebroad

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rebroad

rebroad Jan 17, 2016

NACK statement while it focuses on "increases"... if it said "capacity adjustments" then I'd ACK it, as at points in the future it may be that to scale capacity needs to be decreased, and I'd rather the roadmap was open-minded enough to that possibility also.

NACK, also for these reasons: https://chrispacia.wordpress.com/2016/01/11/against-softforks/

rebroad commented Jan 17, 2016

NACK statement while it focuses on "increases"... if it said "capacity adjustments" then I'd ACK it, as at points in the future it may be that to scale capacity needs to be decreased, and I'd rather the roadmap was open-minded enough to that possibility also.

NACK, also for these reasons: https://chrispacia.wordpress.com/2016/01/11/against-softforks/

@harding

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@harding

harding Jan 20, 2016

Contributor

New signatures should be added here: bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org#53

I'm going to lock this issue now so nobody accidentally posts here.

Contributor

harding commented Jan 20, 2016

New signatures should be added here: bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org#53

I'm going to lock this issue now so nobody accidentally posts here.

@bitcoin-dot-org bitcoin-dot-org locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2016

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.