Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Capacity FAQ Chinese translation #1184

Merged
merged 24 commits into from Jan 5, 2016

Conversation

Projects
None yet
Contributor

jl2012 commented Dec 28, 2015

No description provided.

Cobra-Bitcoin and others added some commits Oct 16, 2015

Remove Coinbase
Remove Coinbase from the choose your wallet page.
Merge pull request #1178 from Cobra-Bitcoin/remove-coinbase
Remove Coinbase from the "Choose your Wallet" page
Update about page
Update domain owners list

Thank you.

This is contemptible. Are childish and spiteful knee jerk reactions sufficient reasons for cutting code?

unbelievable.
You are doing damage to bitcoin.

Absolutely outrageous!

Some people are really doing there best to make bitcoin (core) synonymous with censorship.... a sad move indeed!

NACK this change, this is just rediculios!

Once they see this, they are definitely going to switch back to Core.

I bet they're really scared right now. What else can we do to make them change? Start a hashtag on Twitter? Tell our parents? Write a Tumblr post about it? C'mon guys let's push them over the edge!

This is pretty ridiculous. Coinbase is clearly one of the leaders in the industry and they help make Bitcoin accessible to everyone. You are acting like children.

Coinbase is now running Bitcoin XT in their production servers. XT is an contentious hard fork attempt that will create a new altcoin and split the community and blockchain should it ever go into effect. If this ever happens, Coinbase's customers may find that they no longer own any actual Bitcoin.

See the whole thread here: #1178

Stopp trolling about that an altcoin will be created and that community will be splited and that people will not own any bitcoin! It's just wrong and untrue!
It's these kind of comments that HAS splitted the community allready.

Contributor

jlopp replied Dec 27, 2015

@chris-belcher Spare us the "altcoin" FUD - you don't get to decide what is Bitcoin and what isn't - the markets will decide.

@jlopp Spare us the "censorship" FUD. bitcoin-dot-org is a privately run website that has the freedom to associate with who it likes. On a free and open internet it's very hard to censor anything anyway.

XT is an altcoin. If instead of lifting the max_block_size it lifted the 21m money supply I would say the same thing. Sure you might say now the community is filled with libertarian goldbugs who wouldn't accept it, but in a few years time with more adoption the make-up of the community might be very different.
I really don't see the difference between the two changes, both are harmful to bitcoin's ideals of decentralization, censorship resistance and monetarily sovereignty.

If you want a market to decide, have a look at this thread I've contributed to: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1157898.0 It provides a way to trade XT-coins for core-coins before a hardfork ever happens. In that thread I've written a proposal to trade my future XT for your future core coins at a very attractive rate. I'm happy to put my money where my mouth is, but since August when I posted, no XT-supporter has yet taken me up on my offer.

@chris-belcher how does it make it an altcoin? When they put the 1mb hard limit in from 32mb, did that make it an altcoin too?

@chris-belcher
Now I fell really bad by knowing that I've donated 1 BTC to one that supports censorship.

@MorgUK Yep it was, but then everyone switched over with hardly a thought because it was 2010 and the only thing you could buy was pizzas for 10,000btc a piece. In contrast with the much larger ecosystem today where millions more people have bought into the consensus.

@HostFat Do you actually believe I'm against bitcoin somehow? Really? I've spent months of my life improving it with open source projects (as have many people here.) Rejecting BitcoinXT entirely fits with my view of bitcoin as a decentralized, censorship resistant, monetarily sovereign digital cash. We should talk sometime, I'm on IRC if you want to get in touch.

This makes me more in favor of XT. I should finally switch.

Please return coinbase ASAP.
This is insane.
U r acting like irresponsible group of people.
Stop censoring Bitcoin. its all about the freedom of choice.

Azulan commented on 507a578 Dec 28, 2015

What happened to Sirius?

Sign statement
Sign statement

@harding harding self-assigned this Dec 28, 2015

HeaTeR commented Dec 29, 2015

Is the segregated witness soft fork equivalent to a 4MB block size increase, a 2MB increase, a 1.75MB increase, or what? I keep hearing different numbers.

隔离见证软分叉相当于 4MB、2MB、1.75MB 或究竟多少的区块大小增加?我听到的说法各不相同。

jl2012 added some commits Dec 29, 2015

@harding harding added the Core label Dec 29, 2015

Contributor

jl2012 commented Dec 31, 2015

Minor revisions based on @shangzhou 's suggestion.

Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/bitcoin-dot-org/master' in…
…to capacity-increases

# Conflicts:
#	zh_CN/bitcoin-core/capacity-increases.md
#	zh_TW/bitcoin-core/capacity-increases.md

@btcdrak btcdrak commented on the diff Jan 5, 2016

zh_CN/bitcoin-core/capacity-increases-faq.md
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+
@btcdrak

btcdrak Jan 5, 2016

Contributor

missing --- to start the YAML header.

@jl2012

jl2012 Jan 5, 2016

Contributor

Fixed

Contributor

harding commented Jan 5, 2016

Reviewed translations using Google Translate; LGTM. I'll be merging momentarily. Thanks!

@harding harding merged commit c343d5f into bitcoin-dot-org:master Jan 5, 2016

1 check was pending

continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build is in progress
Details

harding added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment