Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to Glossary Definition: Double Spend #1251

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 18, 2016

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
Contributor

VincentPiper commented Feb 29, 2016

Please see the following issue for context: #1248
TLDR: I believe the definition for "double-spend" should not contain the words "spend" or "spent"
and should be more specific and clear to differentiate from the pre-Bitcoin definition of double-spend.

I am not proficient in Github or programming in general, so hopefully this pull request is
appropriate and done correctly. If this is successful, I will also attempt to create a new glossary term
for "spend/spent" and others that may be helpful.

@wbnns wbnns self-assigned this Dec 9, 2016

Contributor

wbnns commented Dec 16, 2016

Unless others object, this will be squashed and merged on Sunday, December 18th.

@VincentPiper Thank you for taking the time to articulate your perspective in #1248 and for learning how to submit a pull request to make the change. Also, for fixing the typo you found.

@wbnns wbnns merged commit f479815 into bitcoin-dot-org:master Dec 18, 2016

1 check passed

continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment