Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to Glossary Definition: Double Spend #1251
Conversation
VincentPiper
added some commits
Feb 29, 2016
wbnns
self-assigned this
Dec 9, 2016
|
Unless others object, this will be squashed and merged on Sunday, December 18th. @VincentPiper Thank you for taking the time to articulate your perspective in #1248 and for learning how to submit a pull request to make the change. Also, for fixing the typo you found. |
wbnns
added
the
Merge Scheduled
label
Dec 16, 2016
wbnns
merged commit f479815
into
bitcoin-dot-org:master
Dec 18, 2016
1 check passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr
The Travis CI build passed
Details
wbnns
referenced this pull request
Dec 18, 2016
Closed
Developer Glossary Definition: Double Spend #1248
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
VincentPiper commentedFeb 29, 2016
Please see the following issue for context: #1248
TLDR: I believe the definition for "double-spend" should not contain the words "spend" or "spent"
and should be more specific and clear to differentiate from the pre-Bitcoin definition of double-spend.
I am not proficient in Github or programming in general, so hopefully this pull request is
appropriate and done correctly. If this is successful, I will also attempt to create a new glossary term
for "spend/spent" and others that may be helpful.