Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove SourceForge (compromised) #547
Conversation
luke-jr
added some commits
Sep 8, 2014
|
Mergeing without ACKs due to circumstances, feel free to revert at will. |
gmaxwell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2014
gmaxwell
merged commit d20d6f6
into
bitcoin-dot-org:master
Sep 8, 2014
|
We'll recover it, but probably move off it completely in any case. We've been unable to get sourceforge to respond, so I thought it better to remove the links for now. It might be a couple hours before things are sorted out. |
|
OK then I'll wait for this to be sorted out before we either fix @luke-jr commits, or revert them. Nothing serious is broken, only a few translated sentences. |
|
@laanwj @gmaxwell @luke-jr What's up with that? Should we drop or keep historical links to the sourceforge website? Do you choose to permanently drop the bitcoin-security mailing list? "s_nakamoto" seems to have been removed from the sourceforge account and the description seems to have been fixed, although there is now a "sf-editor1" account owner. |
|
@saivann Links should mostly be restored when the SourceForge drama is over. From there we can change things as needed. |
jgarzik
commented
Sep 10, 2014
|
I've been in contact with the SourceForge folks. They concluded their audit, and everything should now be restored and verified as original, according to their data. https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/site-support/8512/ The ball is now in our court. @gavinandresen @sipa and myself are admins there. |
|
Ok then unless someone disagrees, I'll revert the commits in 24 hours. |
luke-jr commentedSep 8, 2014
No description provided.