Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
content (en/fr): unconfirmed txs aren't secure #861
Conversation
|
I think this phrasing change is good, and this pull LGTM as long as Travis CI doesn't catch any problems with the h2 id changing. Thanks, @arthurbouquet! @saivann could you please review the French change? |
|
@arthurbouquet Thanks, I'm fine with the English and French rephrasing. "Unconfirmed" in indeed more common lingo. However can we avoid changing the label? It doesn't really matter what ID we use here, changing it I think only causes unnecessary work when managing translations (for instance this has the side effect of deleting translation history and comments on Transifex). |
arthurbouquet
commented
May 24, 2015
|
@saivann It's up to you guys, I changed the label because it was "wrong" from me / I don't know what is a instant tx in bitcoin land :) |
|
@arthurbouquet you can just reverse the Travis CI will re-check the changes, and if everything looks good, I'll merge. By the way, sorry for giving you bad advice. I thought changing the translation anchor made sense too, although I see @saivann's point about it creating needless work on the translation side. |
arthurbouquet
commented
May 24, 2015
|
No worries, commit has been updated to revert labels changes and build is in progrss! (thx for the instructions). |
harding
merged commit 59572c5
into
bitcoin-dot-org:master
May 25, 2015
1 check passed
|
Merged. @arthurbouquet the change should appear on the live site within about 15 minutes. Thanks again for your work! |
|
@harding Uh sorry, I didn't know that you suggested updating the label. It's not a big deal either way for a single translation. I'd be more discouraged if we changed every label name that is more or less relevant due to text changes or just lack of attention :) . @arthurbouquet Thanks for making the change! |
arthurbouquet commentedMay 23, 2015
Hi,
On https://bitcoin.org/en/you-need-to-know - "Instant transactions are less secure"
As for as I know, there isn't any such thing as "instant transactions": only unconfirmed txs which aren't secure! I suggest some changes in this pull request:
PS: I don't have ruby/all the stuffs to build and preview the changes localy, I can't be sure if there won't be any problem with the modification in the html template (h2's id) event if it's "seems ok" (CI will tell :-).