Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create bip-tkhan-CCVS.mediawiki #494

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@tenakakhan
Copy link
Contributor

tenakakhan commented Feb 10, 2017

No description provided.

Type: Standards Track
Created: 2017-02-10
License: BSD-2
Voting Address: 3CoFA3JiK5wxe9ze2HoDGDTmZvkE5Uuwh8 (just an example, don’t send to this!)

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@luke-jr

luke-jr Feb 10, 2017

Member

This header is invalid until the Process BIP is accepted.


==Implementation==

Immediately: Announcement will be made on bitcoincore.org calling for any further max block size related BIP submissions by Block #454,477 (~February 24, 2017).

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@luke-jr

luke-jr Feb 10, 2017

Member

bitcoincore.org is a private website outside the purview of the BIP process.


Immediately: Announcement will be made on bitcoincore.org calling for any further max block size related BIP submissions by Block #454,477 (~February 24, 2017).

Before Block #454,621: All max block size related BIPs are assigned a bitcoin address for voting. Voting begins. Announcement made on bitcoincore.org.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@luke-jr

luke-jr Feb 10, 2017

Member

Proposing voting on hardforks is in itself a hardfork, so this wouldn't be exclusively a Process BIP. Acceptance of this BIP would require approval from the entire Bitcoin community.

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
<pre>
BIP: ?
Layer: Process

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@luke-jr

luke-jr Feb 10, 2017

Member

"Process" is not a layer. This needs to be "Consensus (hard fork)"

@luke-jr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

luke-jr commented Feb 10, 2017

P.S. I discourage even submitting this, as it has already been rejected, and as such it is a waste of everyone's time.

@btcdrak

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

btcdrak commented Feb 10, 2017

This proposal has been soundly rejected on the basis of being unworkable, so it really doesnt make sense to publish it.

@luke-jr

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

luke-jr commented Apr 20, 2017

@tenakakhan Please either address the issues or close this.

@MarcoFalke

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

MarcoFalke commented Oct 11, 2019

Should be closed

@luke-jr luke-jr closed this Nov 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.