Create bip-tkhan-CCVS.mediawiki #494
Conversation
| Type: Standards Track | ||
| Created: 2017-02-10 | ||
| License: BSD-2 | ||
| Voting Address: 3CoFA3JiK5wxe9ze2HoDGDTmZvkE5Uuwh8 (just an example, don’t send to this!) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This header is invalid until the Process BIP is accepted.
|
|
||
| ==Implementation== | ||
|
|
||
| Immediately: Announcement will be made on bitcoincore.org calling for any further max block size related BIP submissions by Block #454,477 (~February 24, 2017). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
bitcoincore.org is a private website outside the purview of the BIP process.
|
|
||
| Immediately: Announcement will be made on bitcoincore.org calling for any further max block size related BIP submissions by Block #454,477 (~February 24, 2017). | ||
|
|
||
| Before Block #454,621: All max block size related BIPs are assigned a bitcoin address for voting. Voting begins. Announcement made on bitcoincore.org. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Proposing voting on hardforks is in itself a hardfork, so this wouldn't be exclusively a Process BIP. Acceptance of this BIP would require approval from the entire Bitcoin community.
| @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ | |||
| <pre> | |||
| BIP: ? | |||
| Layer: Process | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"Process" is not a layer. This needs to be "Consensus (hard fork)"
|
P.S. I discourage even submitting this, as it has already been rejected, and as such it is a waste of everyone's time. |
|
This proposal has been soundly rejected on the basis of being unworkable, so it really doesnt make sense to publish it. |
|
@tenakakhan Please either address the issues or close this. |
|
Should be closed |
No description provided.