Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Oversize transaction: Coin selection ignoring large unspent, coalescing small unspents #3631

Closed
jbreher opened this issue Feb 5, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@jbreher
Copy link

jbreher commented Feb 5, 2014

Through discussion on forum, I am led to believe that QT should should endeavor to use unspent outputs large enough to keep transaction below threshold that would incur additional transaction fee. This does not seem to be working for me. Please see

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=449385.msg4946463#msg4946463

for evidence of large unspent, able to cover entire transaciton, and

https://blockchain.info/tx/966b82abb713551355342c6764db56b57e28cb8eafbb823de530f2fc9b306d74?show_adv=true

for how the transaction was made up of seven small unspents instead.

Bitcoin-QT v0.8.6-beta on OS X 10.7.5

@boborsomeoneelse
Copy link

Litecoin with coincontrol shows lots of useful details for unspents. One missing feature that would help in this case would be if coincontrol were to show what unspents would be selected in automatic mode. (coincontrol isn't in a release version of bitcoin yet, only litecoin and special bitcoin builds)

@laanwj laanwj added Bug labels May 2, 2014
@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Feb 16, 2016

Duplicate of "coin selection code does very badly in some cases #1643"

@laanwj laanwj closed this as completed Feb 16, 2016
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2020
* Include protocol version into MNAUTH

* Introduce MNAUTH_NODE_VER_VERSION = 70218
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants