Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Backports for 0.14.3 #10516
+884
−264
Conversation
jonasschnelli
and others
added some commits
Jan 6, 2017
practicalswift
and others
added some commits
Mar 16, 2017
fanquake
added this to the
0.14.2
milestone
Jun 4, 2017
fanquake
added the
Backport
label
Jun 4, 2017
|
Maybe leave this for 0.14.3? We're already in the 0.14.2 rc cycle, which I think is too late to add so much. |
jnewbery
and others
added some commits
Feb 7, 2017
|
I don't see anything too critical here, so fine with me if it waits for 0.14.3. |
jnewbery
and others
added some commits
Apr 19, 2017
fanquake
modified the milestone: 0.14.3, 0.14.2
Jun 6, 2017
|
Moved to 0.14.3 milestone. |
luke-jr
changed the title from
Backports for 0.14.2 to Backports for 0.14.3
Jun 6, 2017
|
Does anything new need to be added here? |
|
I haven't reviewed anything since nearly a month ago. Newer stuff can get another PR? |
|
Yes, if people agree with the list of PRs backported here (didn't find anything objectionable in a quick scan, at least) and they're backported properly this should be merged. |
|
utACK 76f9cf9 |
|
utACK ff274d3 |
laanwj
merged commit ff274d3
into
bitcoin:0.14
Jul 6, 2017
1 check passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr
The Travis CI build passed
Details
laanwj
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 6, 2017
|
|
laanwj |
91be5e3
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
luke-jr commentedJun 3, 2017
•
edited
Sorry this is late. It should have backports of everything from PRs 10234..10495, except for #10318, 965a124, and 513da90 which seem too complex for a trivial backport.