Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable various p2sh-p2wpkh functionality #11089
Conversation
| + if (!IsValid() || vchVersion != Params().Base58Prefix(CChainParams::SCRIPT_ADDRESS)) { | ||
| + return false; | ||
| + } | ||
| + memcpy(scriptID.begin(), &vchData[0], 20); |
|
utACK 7fb9887 |
fanquake
added
the
Wallet
label
Aug 20, 2017
|
utACK 8f6765a |
instagibbs
added some commits
Oct 21, 2016
| @@ -281,6 +281,15 @@ bool CBitcoinAddress::GetKeyID(CKeyID& keyID) const | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| +bool CBitcoinAddress::GetScriptID(CScriptID& scriptID) const | ||
| +{ | ||
| + if (!IsValid() || vchVersion != Params().Base58Prefix(CChainParams::SCRIPT_ADDRESS)) { |
laanwj
added this to the 0.15.1 milestone
Aug 23, 2017
|
Added 0.15.1 milestone |
|
|
laanwj
added
the
Needs backport
label
Aug 23, 2017
|
needs rebase |
laanwj
added this to Blockers
in High-priority for review
Sep 14, 2017
|
This needs a rebase after CBitcoinAddress was removed in #11117. However, this will become much easier after #11167, as then native witness destinations can be used. Also, I'm not convinced that dumpprivkey for (p2sh or not) segwit addresses is the right approach, as you can't expect importprivkey to work for those. |
laanwj
removed this from Blockers
in High-priority for review
Sep 28, 2017
|
Needs rebase |
|
Either close (because it's in #11403) or rebase? |
MarcoFalke
removed
the
Needs backport
label
Nov 9, 2017
MarcoFalke
removed this from the 0.15.2 milestone
Nov 9, 2017
|
Removing from backport |
luke-jr commentedAug 18, 2017
A subset of #9017