Skip to content

/ bitcoin

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rpc: Expose block height of wallet transactions #17437

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 12, 2019
Merged

rpc: Expose block height of wallet transactions #17437

merged 1 commit into from Nov 12, 2019

Conversation

@promag
Copy link
Member

promag commented Nov 11, 2019

Closes #17296.
@promag

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member Author

promag commented Nov 11, 2019

I can add a release note to list affected RPC.

I think I'm also going to add tests for each affected RPC.
@MarcoFalke

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

MarcoFalke commented Nov 11, 2019

Misssing update of the help doc
@practicalswift

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

practicalswift commented Nov 11, 2019

Concept ACK
@promag promag force-pushed the promag:2019-11-rpc-blockheight branch from 3018a7f to 36d9042 Nov 11, 2019
@promag

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member Author

promag commented Nov 11, 2019

Added release note, tests and updated help doc.
@practicalswift

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

practicalswift commented Nov 11, 2019

ACK 36d9042 -- diff looks correct
@ryanofsky
ryanofsky approved these changes Nov 11, 2019
View changes
Copy link
Contributor

ryanofsky left a comment

Code review ACK 36d9042. Nice one line code change
test/functional/wallet_listtransactions.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@promag promag force-pushed the promag:2019-11-rpc-blockheight branch 2 times, most recently from d5cfd7a to 19d2f1a Nov 11, 2019
@ryanofsky
ryanofsky approved these changes Nov 11, 2019
View changes
Copy link
Contributor

ryanofsky left a comment

Code review ACK 19d2f1a. Just suggested test changes since last review
test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@promag promag force-pushed the promag:2019-11-rpc-blockheight branch from 19d2f1a to 865051c Nov 11, 2019
@theStack
theStack suggested changes Nov 11, 2019
View changes
test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/functional/wallet_listsinceblock.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@promag
rpc: Expose block height of wallet transactions
Loading status checks…
a5e7795
@promag promag force-pushed the promag:2019-11-rpc-blockheight branch from 865051c to a5e7795 Nov 11, 2019
@theStack
theStack approved these changes Nov 12, 2019
View changes
Copy link
Contributor

theStack left a comment

ACK a5e7795
@practicalswift

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

practicalswift commented Nov 12, 2019

ACK a5e7795 -- diff looks correct now (good catch @theStack!)
@laanwj

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Nov 12, 2019

I expected this to be more expensive, but as it exposes data that is already in the internal data structures anyway, good idea!
@promag

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member Author

promag commented Nov 12, 2019

Kudos to @ariard and @ryanofsky!
@ryanofsky
ryanofsky approved these changes Nov 12, 2019
View changes
Copy link
Contributor

ryanofsky left a comment

Code review ACK a5e7795. Changes since last review getblockhash python test fixes, and removing the last hardcoded height
MarcoFalke added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2019
@MarcoFalke
Merge #17437: rpc: Expose block height of wallet transactions
Verified
This commit was signed with a verified signature.
MarcoFalke
GPG key ID: D2EA4850E7528B25 Learn about signing commits
Loading status checks…
1028882 
a5e7795 rpc: Expose block height of wallet transactions (João Barbosa)

Pull request description:

  Closes #17296.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK a5e7795 -- diff looks correct now (good catch @theStack!)
  theStack:
    ACK a5e7795
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK a5e7795. Changes since last review getblockhash python test fixes, and removing the last hardcoded height

Tree-SHA512: 57dcd0e4e7083f34016bf9cf8ef578fbfde49e882b6cd8623dd1c64716e096e62f6177a4c2ed94f5de304e751fe23fb9d11cf107a86fbf0a3c5f539cd2844916
@MarcoFalke MarcoFalke merged commit a5e7795 into bitcoin:master Nov 12, 2019
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
@promag promag deleted the promag:2019-11-rpc-blockheight branch Nov 12, 2019
luke-jr added a commit to bitcoinknots/bitcoin that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2019
@promag @luke-jr
rpc: Expose block height of wallet transactions
80d348a 
Github-Pull: bitcoin#17437
Rebased-From: a5e7795
@luke-jr

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

luke-jr commented Nov 17, 2019

Isn't this semi-redundant with "confirmations"?
@laanwj

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Nov 18, 2019

Isn't this semi-redundant with "confirmations"?

Lacking an atomic way to query the current height at the same time, this is slightly less error prone.
@jonatack jonatack mentioned this pull request Nov 20, 2019
Closed
luke-jr added a commit to bitcoinknots/bitcoin that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2020
@promag @luke-jr
rpc: Expose block height of wallet transactions
3a4b664 
Github-Pull: bitcoin#17437
Rebased-From: a5e7795
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@theStack theStack

@ryanofsky ryanofsky

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
RPC/REST/ZMQ
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing block height in listsinceblock and gettransaction
8 participants
@promag @MarcoFalke @practicalswift @laanwj @luke-jr @theStack @ryanofsky @fanquake
You can’t perform that action at this time.