New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parse URIs with non-BTC amounts #553

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@luke-jr
Member

luke-jr commented Oct 4, 2011

This syntax has had plenty of time wasted arguing over whether it should be tolerated syntax; please don't bother wasting more time on that discussion. I can't force anyone to merge it, but I can at least make it easy for those who decide to tolerate it. Please keep in mind that it doesn't hurt the BTC-only URIs at all, and if nobody ends up using it for other units, it can always be removed later.
Best case scenario: people use it and bitcoin-qt works correctly
Worst case scenario: people don't use it, and it can be removed

For 5 cBTC, use: amount=5x6
For 5 mBTC, use: amount=5x5
For 5 μBTC, use: amount=5x2
For 5 Satoshis, use: amount=5x0

@luke-jr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@luke-jr

luke-jr Oct 5, 2011

Member

As I said, this is not the place to waste time arguing for or against using it.

Member

luke-jr commented Oct 5, 2011

As I said, this is not the place to waste time arguing for or against using it.

@TheBlueMatt

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@TheBlueMatt

TheBlueMatt Oct 5, 2011

Contributor

I wasnt, I was providing links to the previous arguments for people to see the history. Frankly, I couldnt care less whether or not this gets merged, I was just providing history.

Contributor

TheBlueMatt commented Oct 5, 2011

I wasnt, I was providing links to the previous arguments for people to see the history. Frankly, I couldnt care less whether or not this gets merged, I was just providing history.

@gavinandresen

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@gavinandresen

gavinandresen Oct 5, 2011

Contributor

No consensus that this is a good idea, closing.

Contributor

gavinandresen commented Oct 5, 2011

No consensus that this is a good idea, closing.

luke-jr added a commit to bitcoinknots/bitcoin that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2016

ptschip pushed a commit to ptschip/bitcoin that referenced this pull request May 17, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment