scripts: rename compile to compileToBuffer (bikeshed)

[dcousens]

Still not sure about this, so I figured I'd put it on its own.
decompileToChunks seems very context specific.

I feel like these names could be resolved by just basic documentation?

[weilu]

I still prefer more specific names. We don't have documentation, yet.

[dcousens]

I think we'll resolve this with documentation in 2.0.0 (#272).
The proposed names are effective at inferring the types to users, however they seem out of place when you are using the ambidextrous nature of the functions internally.
They also become cumbersome:

scripts.decompileToChunks(scripts.compileToBuffer(chunks))

vs

scripts.decompile(scripts.compile(chunks))

It is also hard to decide whether the name should always include the source type, such as: scripts.decompileBufferToChunks.
I'm not sure if we would want to do that verbosity of function name across all our free functions... (verb(typeA -> typeB) seems verbose).

[dcousens]

Open to discussion, but, again, lets see a convention first, then go with it.
It should probably be consistent with/without an object OOP context.