Blog: add post with all bech32 content to date#146
Blog: add post with all bech32 content to date#146jnewbery merged 2 commits intobitcoinops:masterfrom
Conversation
|
tACK. Note that I only built locally and tested - I didn't review the actual changes, so someone else should do that. I'm glad we're doing this now so that we have something easily shareable. It is already an impressive compilation. I assume we plan to append each week's section to this when we publish the weekly newsletter? Also this seems to belong in our scaling book too ... maybe repurpose it there in August when all 24 are complete? |
Yep. Sections from this point forward will be written in the |
|
|
||
| excerpt: > | ||
| Copies of all published parts from our weekly series on bech32 sending | ||
| support, scheduled to run 24 weeks from March 19th to August 28th, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you s/scheduled to run/running for/ we won't need to update this once the series is complete.
| {% include references.md %} | ||
|
|
||
| On this page are copies of all published parts from our weekly series | ||
| on bech32 sending support, scheduled to run 24 weeks from March 19th to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As above, consider s/scheduled to run/running for/.
|
|
||
| *Originally publised in [Newsletter #47][].* | ||
|
|
||
| {% include specials/bech32/10-snooze-lose.md %} |
661e000 to
983a2fb
Compare
|
@jnewbery the sentence has been rephrased. Thanks! |
|
ACK 983a2fb. Thanks Dave! |
Closes #128
This moves each bech32 sending support section into a separate includable file and then includes each of them in two different places: first, in the newsletter that originally included them; second, in a blog post backdated to the start of our series. I think this makes the combined content highly accessible, as it's all easily searchable using find-in-page.
This required moving links around and also moving where we included references.md in some previous newsletters (because it contains variable definitions, it must appear before we use those variables, which means including it before the subsequently-included bech32 sections. However, it can't go at the very top of the file, since that breaks the automatic first-paragraph summary used on the newsletter index page.)
A separate commit in this PR also adds a script that automates most of the work of creating the link reference definitions for old newsletters. Manually creating those links was annoying for me, even if it only took 30 seconds a week.
When making a change like this that makes a lot of backend changes but minimal frontend changes, my preferred testing method is comparing diffs of the rendered site. E.g.:
I think that looks good. (You can drop the -N from diff to suppress new files so that you only see the changes to existing files, which is a minimal diff.)