Permalink
Fetching contributors…
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
105 lines (77 sloc) 4 KB
BSIP: 0034
Title: Always Trigger Margin Call When Call Price Above Or At Price Feed
Author: Abit More <https://github.com/abitmore>
Status: Installed
Type: Protocol
Created: 2018-02-18
Discussion: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/606
Replaces: -
Worker: 1.14.95

Abstract

Currently, in BitShares, a short position may be margin called only when both two requirements are met:

  • call price is above or equal to median price feed
  • no limit order on the book is buying collateral with price higher than the short position's call price

This behavior has led to certain confusion and anger among market participants.

This BSIP proposes a new behavior to improve the situation: drop the second requirement, trigger margin call when the first requirement is met.

Motivation

To avoid ambiguity, in this article, all prices are in terms of debt asset / collateral asset, aka how much debt asset per collateral asset. A bid is an order to buy collateral asset with debt asset.

Generally, a short position may be margin called when its collateral ratio is below or equal to maintenance collateral ratio (MCR).

However, to calculate collateral ratio, a fair collateral price is needed.

In BitShares, there are two data sources can be used to decide the fair collateral price:

  • the internal market
  • the price feeds

Currently, both data sources are used. Specifically, collateral price is decided as the higher one between the highest bid price on the internal market and the median price feed. That said, when a short position's collateral ratio has fallen to below or equal to MCR according to median price feed (in this case, call price of the short position is above or equal to median price feed), if there is a bid on the market with high price, the short position won't be margin called.

This mechanism has led to certain confusion and anger among market participants.

  • there are often orders with overlapping price on the book but didn't fill
  • there are often short positions selling collaterals with low prices, but traders are unable to buy at those prices
  • it often causes borrowers to sell collaterals at a low price when have chances to sell at higher price
  • market manipulators / arbitrage traders have more chances to force borrowers to sell collaterals at lower price

This BSIP effectively proposes a new behavior: derive the fair collateral price only from price feeds.

Rationale

Since price feeds are provided by a set of chosen producers, the median price feed is usually considered trustworthy. On the other hand, instant market price is not as reliable, especially for the markets with poor depth, so it's a rather limited supplement for calculating collateral price.

At this moment, changing the rule to only use median price feed will clear away the confusion the end users may have, while still keeping the derived collateral price fair to an extent.

After this change is done, placing a new limit order will no longer trigger a margin call, cancelling a limit order or expiring a limit order will no longer trigger a margin call as well, that means we don't need to check for new margin calls nor black swan events in those scenarios, so we'll gain a side benefit on performance.

Specifications

In check_call_orders(...) function of database class, when matching a call order with a limit order, there is a check: if( match_price > ~call_itr->call_price ), when the result is true, processing will be ended and margin_called will be returned. Need to skip the check and the following return action.

In do_apply(...) function of limit_order_cancel_evaluator class, and similar code blocks after a limit order object is removed, no longer need to call check_call_orders(...) function of database class.

Discussion

[to be added if any]

Summary for Shareholders

[to be added if any]

Copyright

This document is placed in the public domain.

See Also