You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
value (0, 95) (1, 95)
value (1, 95) (4, 95)
value (4, 95) (6, 95)
value (6, 95) (7, 95)
value (7, 95) (8, 95)
value (8, 95) (8.999999999999998, 95)
value (8.999999999999998, 95) (9.999999999999998, 95)
value (9.999999999999998, 95) (10.999999999999998, 95)
value (10.999999999999998, 95) (12, 95)
Screenshots or screencasts of the bug in action
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ALL software version info (bokeh, python, notebook, OS, browser, any other relevant packages)
bokeh.version = 1.1.0
python: 3.7.3
OS: Windows 10
browser: all
Description of expected behavior and the observed behavior
The value of slider does not have integer precision when I use step=1
E.g. I get values that are 8.99999999999 instead of expected 9
I understand that float precision may not be the exact integer, but I do see 9 in the UI, so I expect to get 9 or at least 9.0 as the result.
Potentially this needs an argument to set the slider as integer instead of float?
Complete, minimal, self-contained example code that reproduces the issue
Stack traceback and/or browser JavaScript console output
value (0, 95) (1, 95)
value (1, 95) (4, 95)
value (4, 95) (6, 95)
value (6, 95) (7, 95)
value (7, 95) (8, 95)
value (8, 95) (8.999999999999998, 95)
value (8.999999999999998, 95) (9.999999999999998, 95)
value (9.999999999999998, 95) (10.999999999999998, 95)
value (10.999999999999998, 95) (12, 95)
Screenshots or screencasts of the bug in action
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: