@bobdenotter So shouldn't "group" be renamed to "tab" then...? To keep things logical. Now you assign fields to a certain "group" to have them show up in a certain "tab". Assigning a field to a certain "tab" to have them in a certain "tab" in the UI sounds good to me. And then you can use "group" to group fields. Or "fieldgroup"
My 2 cents:
Collections and Groups sound like they refer to organized pieces of
content, not the atomic parts.
With Bolt CMS "Blocks" I often call them Content Blocks or Section Blocks.
"Repeaters" is a common CMS term meaning just what they are.
I've thought about this term for years when trying to explain it to my
client editors. I don't have a great suggestion. How about "Combination
Field" or "combo" for short?
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:05 AM Bob den Otter ***@***.***> wrote:
I think i'm more in favor of your other suggestion: Name the replacement
for Blocks and Repeaters "Collection", and leave 'group' as is.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub