-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
⭐️ Make "Fieldsets" work (to replace both 'blocks' and 'repeaters') #176
Comments
When implementing this, don't forget to make it work in |
The name 'fieldset' for me is too much tied to a form to use it as a field type name. Other suggestions: 'field groups', 'field collections', or 'grouped fields' |
"Groups" is already used to refer to groups of fields shown on one 'tab' in the editors, so that's confusing too. fields:
title:
type: text
group: Text |
@bobdenotter So shouldn't "group" be renamed to "tab" then...? To keep things logical. Now you assign fields to a certain "group" to have them show up in a certain "tab". Assigning a field to a certain "tab" to have them in a certain "tab" in the UI sounds good to me. And then you can use "group" to group fields. Or "fieldgroup" |
A tab is "what it looks like", not "what it is". It feels kinda like |
If you want to name it what it is, then just rename "group" to "fieldset". But this is UI for the end user, and that person sees a "tab". Any way, you get to use "group" for the group of fields |
I think i'm more in favor of your other suggestion: Name the replacement for Blocks and Repeaters "Collection", and leave 'group' as is. |
My 2 cents:
Collections and Groups sound like they refer to organized pieces of
content, not the atomic parts.
With Bolt CMS "Blocks" I often call them Content Blocks or Section Blocks.
"Repeaters" is a common CMS term meaning just what they are.
I've thought about this term for years when trying to explain it to my
client editors. I don't have a great suggestion. How about "Combination
Field" or "combo" for short?
…On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:05 AM Bob den Otter ***@***.***> wrote:
I think i'm more in favor of your other suggestion: Name the replacement
for Blocks and Repeaters "Collection", and leave 'group' as is.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#176?email_source=notifications&email_token=AABLNAXLCWI6XWOQHIGRM4TQT3CCZA5CNFSM4GHFLKM2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEEF4RTI#issuecomment-554420429>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABLNAST2AJQSZ7GSPEGZ7DQT3CCZANCNFSM4GHFLKMQ>
.
|
Closing, because the feature has been implemented. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: